Comment Re:I did this first (Score 1) 353
Ugh, what a terrible way of handling that. >.<
I mean, the function should obviously be boolean.
Ugh, what a terrible way of handling that. >.<
I mean, the function should obviously be boolean.
Nearly everything you've ever done on the site is recorded into a database. While they fire employees for snooping, more than a few have done it.
I've worked for a call centre under a few contracts. That's pretty much the standard everywhere. First thing we were told before getting access to the CS tools was that yes, you could access pretty much anyone's account info you wanted, and that if you did so for any reason other than it being necessary for your work you would be fired on the spot. Only information such as passwords, credit card numbers and bank account numbers was not readily available. On one contract, we could log into anyone's account on the website and take any actions with it the user could (and then some), though this was done very rarely.
Honestly, it doesn't stress me out all that much; I put nothing on Facebook that I wouldn't want getting into others' hands. I expect that the things I set to "friends only" won't be available to the average Joe who happens by my profile, but at the same time it doesn't surprise or annoy me that Facebook employees can see it. Of course they can.
Good Lord, I agree wholeheartedly. The ribbon is nigh-incomprehensible to first time users. I just had to use a version of Office with the ribbon for the first time a few weeks ago, and I had a hard time with it.
Now, I don't know what it's like once you're used to it, but it didn't seem like a step forward in intuitiveness compared to the old Office menus. I don't think that I can chock that up just to me getting older and being used to the old ways.
I had to use MS Office 2007 a lot at work (over half a year at least, probably not a full year, and mainly Excel and Outlook, not so much Word), and so I got pretty used to the ribbon. My verdict is that I still didn't like it even after getting used to where everything was. Some of the options on the ribbon are hidden completely until you select them in the options. (It was 2 weeks before I learned how to get directly to the vbasic editor again lol.) And hotkeys for menus aren't as quick, requiring extra strokes to get to a function (Alt, then the letter for the tab, then the letter for the section on the tab, then the letter for the function, if my memory serves).
I preferred Office 2003 by far, and certainly prefer the existing versions of OOO to 2007, so I really hope they don't go ahead with this emulation, or at the very least make it optional (developing two versions of the menus however would rather seem like a waste of effort -- doubly so if everyone switched off of the new version!).
Maybe grandparent meant that + should have been used? I mean, in the current wording > resolves before && like so:
A laser diode is much more robust than a laser diode and the frequency-doubling package of nonlinear crystals.
(A laser diode > a laser diode) && the frequency-doubling package of nonlinear crystals.
If it had been worded as "plus" instead of "and" it would have resolved correctly, like so:
A laser diode is much more robust than a laser diode plus the frequency-doubling package of nonlinear crystals.
A laser diode > (a laser diode + the frequency-doubling package of nonlinear crystals).
Never trust a computer you can't repair yourself.