fuel/distance is useless for the driver. A driver says to himself when he is at the gas station, "My trip is x miles and my tank holds y gallons. How many gallons does it take to get to x?" ie mpg. x, the distance, is the constant - and desired goal. Not the available fuel.
No one gets in their car and says well, we can only go to Knotts Berry Farm because we don't have enough gas to get to Disneyland.
All you guys are doing is inverting the ratio and changing the units. Gallons versus liters is irrelevant because gal (u) = L is simply gal = (1/u)L
You have to understand the US ratio x distance per 1 fuel-unit. You guys are saying y fuel-units/100 distance. We literally say "more miles to the gallon" as a perfomance ratio. Its an encouraging statement.
Saying "less liters to the 100km" is psychologically depressing. Everyone wants "more", not "less."
How big would Billy Idol be if he sang, "In the midnight hour, I want less, less, less..."
The MPG scale *IS* liner. Sheesh - what do they teach you guys in Europe!? 1mi +1mi = 2mi. 1gal +1gal = 2 gal.
How is mlpm easier to understand when auto efficiency and roads in the USA are measured in gallons and miles?
Wanna know a secret? MPG and miles are also linear!
"mlpm helps put the idea that gasoline is a great resource
WTF? You think that if you sliced the unit to 1000th of a greater unit it makes it more sacred? LOL. Have you ever looked at the psychology of currency? The smaller the unit, the less people care about it. People throw pennies in the trash! I would wager that the opposite is true. If I had only 1 of something, I would treasure it more than 1000 littler somethings. I could afford to lose a few hundred of the littler somethings because if I round up I still have 1 something.
A slurpee is ~1/4 a gallon
YOUR ENTIRE ARGUMENT IS SUBJECTIVE to the units you are comfortable with. A liter is about 34 ounces (~1/4 gal) - or about 1 Big Gulp Slurpee and an extra sip! LOL. Europeans are already using the slurpee-unit!
If you want to make something sacred, make it expensive and harder to obtain. Like the diamond industry does. Oh, that's right they are ripping us off when it isn't necessary!
*
Regardless, the real solution to the perception problem in the post is to upgrade from a 10mpg car to a 50mpg car. Arguing that the 10-20 path saves more will only encourage people to drive 20mpg cars rather than 50 mpg cars.
These upgrade paths measure % improvement, not actual savings. A 33mpg saves more than the 20mpg car - without upgrading at all!
Why aren't we mentioning time to port? I think that's a significant variable.
Because Apple is the biggest tech company now. You should read Slashdot more often
"There is such a fine line between genius and stupidity." - David St. Hubbins, "Spinal Tap"