Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Permanently modified? (Score 2, Interesting) 426

odd, as i have one in my hot sweaty palm as we speak. seems to work pretty good too.

regarding the SD thing, i've seen reports that the Samsung Focus (currently the only phone with SD storage, and the one i own) is very picky about the cards being used, it doesnt seem to matter which class of card you use or what size, though it can allocate up to 32GB. from what i understand, WP7 will append it on to the existing partition, and the fault occurs when the card is removed and reinserted, the device will only recognize 15MB free space and then both the phone and card must be reformatted. but again its not been identified publicly as to what causes this issue. the original notion was that the SD card quality may be a key factor, WP7 may not like seeing a bunch of unusable blocks on a card. i know many cards have some sketchy reliability.

Comment Re:Not true (Score 1) 397

i guess my point is that it all depends on the application. every modern engine that runs on the street needs an ECU so really the article has implications for all vehicles. not trying to be pedantic or anything but i try to look at the largest practical scope possible, in this case it would include motorcycles, semi trucks and everything in between.

Comment Re:not fastest (Score 1) 397

while i agree you shouldnt need ABS to be a safe driver, the fact is pretty much all new cars come with it, so lets go with the assumption that its equipped that way. in this case, i certainly want to know that the ABS is functioning because lets face it, the uncertainty of whether or not the ABS will fire is of huge importance when trying to avoid an accident. if i know i have ABS i'm ok, if i know i dont, i'm ok, if i'm unsure, thats dangerous.

Comment Re:As a rabid lefty (Score 1) 486

yeah.... i hear thats what all the kids are saying these days... unprotected whatnot.... but listen, the Document says:

Congress shall make no law... prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech... seems to me the way they wrote it didnt make that distinction.

the idea that was America, failed a long time ago. We're just here to witness the aftermath.

Comment Re:No problem ... don't index (Score 1) 338

i think its still an "if". as you said they are a for profit company and just because they're for profit doesnt make them necessarily stupid. i doubt they'd shoot them selves in the foot like that. its symbolic. they recognize that they are the unparalleled champions of search and that drives the hits which drives the ad revenue. if their all encompassing page-rank system were to be subverted by The Google itself it would draw into question Googles credibility for search (regardless of their credibility as a company, their credibility for search is undeniable). it could seriously damage the brand. thats why Google was in that fiasco with China, they were afraid of damaging the brand by diluting searches. Fortunately for them the Chinese voice little concern over being censored.

Comment Re:As a rabid lefty (Score 1) 486

what many are failing to realize is that, more important than network pwnage, or even monetary loss, the man abridged other peoples right to free speech, maliciously. the right to free speech was the very first thing the founders of the US felt needed to be added to their constitution, its something held sacred in America. if you want to know if the punishment is fair, look at other 1st amendment cases with criminal proceedings. i'll bet you anything this is either average or light sentencing. in this instance a DDoS suppressed other peoples right to communicate. i mean... thats a pretty big deal. the whole net neutrality thing is wrapped up in ISPs imposing limits on free speech over the internet.

rather than balking at the sentence, look at the most important issue here, not DDoS, not politics, not his record.

Comment Re:law enforcement (Score 1) 274

right but the whole point of making open source drivers (or more accurately in this case open source firmware) is to bypass the need for the software license and therefore gain the ability to operate it with other electronics, to do this the product is reverse engineered and thats a perfectly legal process.

Slashdot Top Deals

6 Curses = 1 Hexahex

Working...