(Let us assume, for example, the sender uses software or a mass-email account with a company:)
Suppose an email Recipient receives ve$0.02 credit for every message reported as spam, debited
against the Sender's account and payable to the Recipient's email account, in increments of ve$10;
Further suppose, the otherwise legitimate source of said software or mass-email account must
by regulatory restrictions through CAN-SPAM register for the purposes suggested herein; and
(among other things,)
pay the Recipient, as the Service is commercially benefiting, and/or restrict the Sender'(s) account -
bear in mind, no one wants to set up or install commercial email routines every 100 messages
while racking up $50 expenses, but it takes money to make money, and customer satisfaction...
Although the following is very much the clear and present reality, Heaven forbid
even one person, objecting to spam, should receive the following notification-
"You have received a collect spam from [nobody]; do you accept the charge(s)?
Painfully, this indeed is what is currently going on, but to put it in those precise words, well, you get
the idea.
What ever happened to the thing about, "...it takes money to make money..." anyhow?
The internet gives only spam the right to negate that? Yeah, right... get a life, you lawbot.
And why, for goodness' sake, hasn't it been the case, all along.
Anything else is simply a case of WHOIS harrassment through a third party.
A no brainer, out-of-place, casts a lot of pennies the wrong direction, and
were talkin' a lot of pennies, here.