I agree with sibling poster. The start is the most hideously dull thing ever, but once you're past the first temple it starts getting more interesting, and it's actually pretty awesome by the end. Well, if you liked OoT, anyway.

Firstly, let me admit that I learned English post-1980.

Secondly, IANAL[inguist], the second sentence, "Sarah is acting foolish.", doesn't seem incorrect to me as I read "is acting" in a similar way to "smells". That is, to me the sentence reads "Sarah is acting [as if she were] foolish.". Should one then say "Sarah is acting oldly.", or whatever the adverbial form of "old" is?

Just my $x cents

I think the issue is more that tab and space are visually indistinguishable.
A good guideline is that you should be able to glean all the semantically meaningful data from the source code even on a hard-copy. I can certainly see a newline in hard-copy (although I can't tell whether it's \n, \r\n, \r or whatever). Similarly, I can see tabs in hard-copy, but I can't tell them apart from spaces, so in that sense it's wrong for them to be any more semantically meaningful.

I thought they were on ships?

If they are just slightly-lower-power laptops (I don't really follow the whole "netbook" fad thingamajiggy), it seems that there's little point in having a separate term for them. Why not just call them laptops?

Oh, and gerroff my lawn.

Your point?

The film was also shown in Dolby 3D in selected theaters. -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Up_(2009_film)

(For the record, I saw it in 3D, and it was excellent.)

Because you're a customer of the electronics company you bought it from. ... just not the media outlet serving your streaming media.

Actually, I believe they call the euro-cents, er... cents (or sometimes euro cents, says Wikipedia helpfully).

My suggestion: Binary-Coded Decimal!

I thought a netbook was by definition a low-end, portable laptop used only for browsing and light typing. You know, a "net" book...

Actually, I think what the GP is asking is

If you were going to run Windows, why would you buy a Linux netbook in the first place, for practically the same price?

Yeah, but who answers those with the real values?

It works fine for me, but then I'm usually only interested in the text anyway.

Well, whether you treat a collective noun as singular or plural (which obviously varies by context) I am still firmly of the belief that the verb and the pronoun should agree, which is, I think, what the GP wanted to express. Of course, it isn't technically a subject verb agreement thing, but you should probably treat the subject the same way throughout the sentence. That's why "has unveiled their" sounds odd. "has" treats VG as a singular, whereas "their" treats it as a plural. This change in the space of a couple of words is just a little disorienting.

I disagree about NULL being false as being a largely arbitrary design choice. To me it reads as

if (/* there is a */ thing)
    doSomethingWith(thing);

To me, that's a hell of a lot clearer than

if (thing != NULL)