Comment Re:slashdot is broken (Score 1) 55
Why would you reply anonymously to a person who cannot see Anonymous posts?
Why would you reply anonymously to a person who cannot see Anonymous posts?
Coral cached pics:
http://preview.rrauction.com.nyud.net/content/images/scans/3223/3223557_1.jpg
http://preview.rrauction.com.nyud.net/content/images/scans/3223/3223557_2.jpg
http://preview.rrauction.com.nyud.net/content/images/scans/3223/3223557_3.jpg
http://preview.rrauction.com.nyud.net/content/images/scans/3223/3223557_4.jpg
Lamness filter is crap. So to fill in more words... Blah Blaah Blaaah Blaaaah
Too bad, it does not come with 3G. That is a deal breaker for me.
Unless of course you expect the revenue to change rapidly in the next few years. Which is what people expect to happen to facebook. I would say $16B is undervalued, for such a company (i also believe $50 is really over valued though)
I am willing to pay for ad free, reasonable ToS, and privacy guaranteed service. Is any one offering one?
I find Blekko.com to be decent.
Quoted from a techcrunch article
In addition to providing regular search capabilities like Google’s, Blekko allows you to define what it calls “slashtags” and filter the information you retrieve according to your own criteria. Slashtags are mostly human-curated sets of websites built around a specific topic, such as health, finance, sports, tech, and colleges. So if you are looking for information about swine flu, you can add “/health” to your query and search only the top 70 or so relevant health sites rather than tens of thousands spam sites. Blekko crowdsources the editorial judgment for what should and should not be in a slashtag, as Wikipedia does. One Blekko user created a slashtag for 2100 college websites. So anyone can do a targeted search for all the schools offering courses in molecular biology, for example. Most searches are like this—they can be restricted to a few thousand relevant sites. The results become much more relevant and trustworthy when you can filter out all the garbage.
If you are invested in pension or mutual funds, you do have wealth in the stock market. If you are not, you dont speak for the majority, and your opinion doesn't matter.
You cant fly!
His point is that, lack of flash is the reason he likes iPhones (because he sees less intrusive ads compared to his PC or Cable or Android) and hence iPhone wins.
Does the one hour really make a difference for you?
Wikileaks gave The Pentagon the option to redact sensitive information, and they refused.
Pentagon actually did reply, claiming everything wikileaks had was sensitive.
/ducks
Over the lifetime of the car, not much.
If Gandhi were alive today, he would DDoS British Salt Manufactures website, so that no one buys salt from them. So you point that DDoS is bad, is still moot.
BTW DDoSers are pretty easy to identify, and the DDoSers know it too. But they also know, they cant arrest all of them (just like the Gandhi's followers knew). And just like Gandhi's followers did not print a list of people that participated in the salt march, Anons did not publish a list of DDoSers. The simply dont have to go on record exposing themselves.
I am well aware that the money goes to himself, and not a penny may go to wikileaks or any non-profit org. But my point is he deserves it.
Do you have any reason why the money should no go to him (apart from the point that he is profiting from rape(which I have already countered))
BTW, its not Micheal Moorer was just of the contributors to his bail bond. And I am sure if he had had this money with him, he would have himself posted it.
Systems programmers are the high priests of a low cult. -- R.S. Barton