Comment Re:Congressman? (Score 1) 96
He said usually. While it is technically correct, the common use or Congressman for the house Senator for the senate.
He said usually. While it is technically correct, the common use or Congressman for the house Senator for the senate.
Yea, for 30ft runs.
Way to piss off the community you asked to hack your system. I'm sure this will go well.
Why the network operators didn't get requests to shutdown the network, that doesn't mean it wasn't jammed. The military has jammers it uses where they suspect IEDs to prevent triggering via the cell network. There is no reason why the BPD, DHS or other agency would not have jammers for such an occasion. I would be surprised if they did not with all the money that was thrown around after 9/11
Look at it this way, North Korea just blew its load and showed the world how it has compromised their networks. Now we can better defend our systems going forward, assuming businesses take away a lesson from this.
How about hiring some americans at competitive wages, instead of indentured servants?
Just because you don't graduate as an engineer doesn't mean you dont graduate. The failed engineers at PSU frequently become the best business majors.
People have a reasonable expectation of privacy, except when they are in public. Also, corporations aren't people. So if your agg business is dumping shit into a stream and I get a picture of it from my drone, its the companies bad, not mine.
I wonder, did MIT disclose its terms of service with the users? I suspect not, as thats a contract between JSTOR and MIT.
Did his actions prevent anyone else from accessing JSTOR? As for as I read, JSTOR never went down, so in that case, not its not a DOS.
Cause they regulate their x-ray scanners so well?
I wonder what rate Goldman Sacks or any other large bank would have loan money to AIG at. I wait, I know, infinity. Because no one was willing to bet on their retarded bankrupted ass. So 14% sounds like a deal to me. Hell try getting a credit card with that rate when you have bad credit.
We have separation of powers. Congress writes the budget, appropriates funds, and signs off on debt. Congress also knows that both houses and the President need to sign anything they pass. The President, constitutionally can do none of this. So, if Congress wants to defund things, it can, but they have to do it in a way the President agrees. Also, remember, the House needs to write a bill the Senate will pass. Forget getting it to the President.
We just re-elected Obama, and the House and Senate, even after reapportionment, lost Rs. Its Congresses job to work with the President at this point, not the other way around.
Yea, I'm sure if Obama is planning to use the only constitutional out, he probably would not sign this bill.
Its been done. Ive seen it work.
The content industry wont let cable do it, and the vast majority of the operators want ala carte.
If they wont let cable do it they would never ever let an over the top provider do it. Intel has no understanding of this market.
Never ask two questions in a business letter. The reply will discuss the one you are least interested, and say nothing about the other.