Comment Re:Junk newspaper (Score 1) 337
Extremely well written. Thanks for following me up!
Extremely well written. Thanks for following me up!
The funny thing about the nickname "Aftonhoran" is that Aftonbladet recognizes its validity. Try surfing to http://www.aftonhoran.se/ and see what happens.
Yeah, I know about the existence of that domain. Now I heard two stories about it, one which claims that it is owned by Aftonbladet itself, and the other which says that it is owned by a detractor who sometimes points it to his blog and sometimes to the original site. Not sure which one is true.
Anyhow, the domains point to different name servers, but then again it doesn't have to prove anything.
Aftonbladet, often nicknamed "Aftonhoran" ("The Evening Whore") is a miserable tabloid of nearly non-existent intellectual value. A typical issue looks more like a prop from the movie "Idiocracy" than a real newspaper from a civilized country.
Even a quick glance at its website clearly reveals its true values (or lack thereof), even to those who aren't native Swedish speakers.
Totally doesn't hold up. Back when MySpace was big, I don't think I knew more than 2 or 3 people with MySpace pages. It was pretty much exclusively a teen/college hangout.
These days the only people that I know who do NOT have Facebook pages are people without internet connections at all (lots of my family) and people who are security curmudgeons (like me). Even people who barely get on the internet use Facebook. Lots of people only even have an internet connection so that they CAN use Facebook.
You can barely buy a new mobile phone without a client for that shit pre-installed these days.
They're too late to join the game. The problem is that Facebook already has everyone you know, so everyone joins it because everyone else already is there.
Who modded up this drivel as insightful? Failbook has approx 500 million accounts, as in database entries, not necessarily real persons, because of duplicates and forgeries. Even if that (admittedly large) number consisted only of genuine active users, it still hardly represents "everybody".
Could we now please finally quit with the ad nauseam fallacy that "everybody is on Failbook"?
Some random mumblings about walled gardens and open source won't make normal people switch over.
And your definition of "normal people" is - what?
I've never considered Twitter as anything more than a platform for deployment of retarded haiku. No matter how much I frowned upon Facebook, for instance, I can still clearly see its reason for existence. Not Twitter's though.
Gizmodo has shown in the past that they are too immature to be allowed attend these types of events.
Not only Gizmodo, I could argue that the same goes for the whole Gawker network. Take a look, for instance, at Jalopnik, the automotive sibling of Gizmodo. It is written by a bunch of immature imbeciles.
Function reject.