Please explain to us how patch-to-patch-to-patch becoming too much for the system to bear is NOT Microsoft's fault but of the users. Apart from the fact that people are dumb enough to accept it as something that's inherent to computers, it's Microsoft's inability to build a proper update system.

(Running a Debian machine that's been apt-get upgrading and dist-upgrading for as long as I can remember without any patch problems.)

Because:
1) That OS is built once, then the cost of "producing" it, is nill.
2) There IS a competitor (which gives you the exact same crap); free download.
3) Because your CPU does not FAIL as much as your OS will
4) Because your CPU will still work in 5 years. Will the OS?
Anyone who can add anything to this list? :)

How are they to judge what's significant? Looking at their OS, they haven't got a clue!

He clearly insinuates that having other morals than his is a bad thing, yet you try to defend him by saying that people should open up their eyes and see the world?

The world's full of people with money higher up their list than moral or ethics. Welcome to the *real* world. You might want to get used to that :)

Piracy has always been around and it always will be.

Cool! So now they built a relatively environmentally friendly concept that has so many power consuming features that it uses a whole cole power plant on its own. Way to go greenies!

And crashing one of these babies because you're looking for a particular pixel to push on the touch screen would create quite some environmentally unfriendly mess. Blood and all...

No, we need a few more megapixels (or a smaller angle) to get to see him, I guess ;)