Comment Re:Critical mass (Score 1) 519
This was one of the biggest problems in my opinion. Facebook, when it was in it's "beta stage" was exclusive only to university students, which was fine because many of a university student's friends are also university students. Google in their infinite wisdom decided that only certain people were allowed to use Google+ in the beginning, and there wasn't a specific demographic allowed to use it. So I could join, but none of my friends could until they got invited, by which point their fleeting interest had turned to distain, and they saw no reason to not leave Facebook, which had already accepted them. Google+ was basically an elitist product that only the fortunate few could access.
Google tried to treat it's social network like it's email service, which would be fine, but even when Gmail was invite-only, I could still send email to people that didn't have access.
There's no technical or mysterious reason why Google+ is falling over, Google screwed up their release strategy catastrophically. Even Microsoft weren't dumb enough to create an invite-only social network.
Incidentally, you could swap "Google+" for "Diaspora" and get the same story.