social darwinism does indeed back the ideologies of the nazi party and its offshoots the conservation movement, eugenics movement, and ultimately the environmentalists as well... this is because fascism began in the british empire, where it was birthed, endorsed, and bailed out (twice) by london and wall street. the print media lavishly heaped praise upon fascist regimes, calling them model governments. fascist (british monarchy friendly) forces even tried to unseat FDR in a failed revolutionary attempt in the USA, the so-called business plot. british royals even sent their children to the hitler youth for summer camp, as well as other nazi related organizations.
british royals have been known to deplore modern medicine and infrastructure because it works against "natural selection." people who are less "economically fit," they argue, shouldn't reproduce and spread their genes, so they claim we should not have public health care, we should "reduce our population" (genocide thru starvation, etc.), food and fuels should be price rationed, and "resources" should be preserved (for the anglo-americans). nothing about this statement by the legislature is surprising, and if it indeed is based upon this line of thinking with this history in mind, i applaud it.