Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Internet megacorps not on level playing field (Score 2, Insightful) 236

Your initial statement was a bit more important than you may have thought. At a 0% profit rate, ANY business would have to do something or face being driven out of business. And at a 100% tax rate, well, it would be close to impossible to run a modern business, so the point is moot.

You argue that any tax increase on profits will be sent directly to the consumer. This, however, carries a number of implicit assumptions:
1) Increasing the price will not impact sales: Increasing the price by x% may make fewer consumers buy the product, decreasing the sales by y%. This could easily lead to lower total profits for the corporation.
2) No competition: Competing companies may opt not to increase prices and be able to undercut prices. This allows them to build a larger market share by attracting the customers of those corporations that increased prices.

Regarding your arguments on cutting cost, this will happen regardless of taxation. Any corporation in a Capitalist economy will look for ways to minimize costs in order to become more competitive and drive out competition.

Comment Re:Internet megacorps not on level playing field (Score 1, Insightful) 236

You do realize that most countries tax a corporation on its profits, not on its turnover, right? So, it is not the $5000 price per good that is taxed, but the $1000 of profits. And that the corporate tax rate is quite low, compared to income tax. Where I live, corporate tax has been reduced from 50% to 25% over the last 30 years. And guess what? 30 years ago corporations did turn a profit!

Comment Re:Ungrateful krauts (Score 1) 606

That is including community tax. You are getting confused by the tax on the last earned dollar, as this tax can be high, but total income tax will not increase above 51.7 % of the income. As you note, there are other taxes that muddles the picture, as these depend on how the tax earner lives his or her life.

Comment Re: meeses (Score 1) 361

Usually Windows users do the same, but every now and then the device manufacturer wants to "improve" their product by pushing out a new driver. And when I write "improve" what I really mean is "make it suck so bad that the user either has to uninstall the driver (advanced) or get a new mouse (ka-ching)". Whenever Windows Update wants to saddle me with an updated mouse driver, I have learned by experience to press "Hide" on that as fast as possible.

Comment Cause and effect? (Score 2, Insightful) 509

As I understand it, the brain is highly adaptive. This begs the question that early conditioning and training may very well have long term consequences to how our brains develop. If boys and girls are subjected to different stimuli and expectations, it follows that their brains are also going to develop differently. Or, to be more blunt, any change in development trajectories that happen after birth could be due to different biology just as well as environmental pressure on the child. This, naturally, makes it very difficult when one wants to consider which is cause and which is effect.

Comment Re:No different from any other PC (Score 1) 201

I never understood why people think it's a good idea to enter (or even worse, store) credit card info in a phone. That's the height of stupidity, in my opinion.

It's no less secure than your PC. Actually, the average Joe's automatically-updated iPhone is probably more likely to be free of malware than his Windows PC.

It is also a lot easier to steal Joe's iPhone than it is to break into his apartment and run away with his desktop PC ;-)

Slashdot Top Deals

The algorithm for finding the longest path in a graph is NP-complete. For you systems people, that means it's *real slow*. -- Bart Miller

Working...