"misleading trickery" a.k.a. "words"

> At no time was an actual engineer in this area consulted.

So incredibly f-ing doubtful. There's no way that you're passing FCC without an antenna engineer for a greenfield (or even non-trivially modified) design for a product that's even 1% as complex (not to mention as high-revenue) as this.

I'd bet all the Apple products I own on it.

Whoa -- where do *you* live? Whoring is for attention, not money. Attention is the contemporary currency. Hasn't hip-hop and reality TV taught you anything?

Stop making sense. N ur msg iz2long.

> And the nature of SSL is it's pretty much all-or-none.
Totally false.
If you own the machine, you own the machine.
Or, translated into dude-ish, "... you pwn the machine."

Damn, that's going to be a badass-long string of zeroes.

From much of my experience, I'd say that the best phone for many IT workers is the one with the big, red, "Oh Shit..." button on it.

I guess you haven't been reading the entry to which you're replying.
Apparently to you the last piece of the puzzle is that last 10% that takes 90(0-00)% of the effort. So, as long as you number these days with at least four digits, you might get some agreement. Otherwise your argument only holds any water when talking about the x86 bladder, as has been pointed out numerous times already.

> that's not a trick question. It is if it tries to trick you into thinking. So..... there.

... type more?

This is the standard betting-progression fallacy.
It fails to payoff when you either die before winning, or run out of courts.

nobody knowing you're going out for a wok.

Relax... that was the last Russian Usenet feed shutting down -- the spawn of the Arpanet finally got 'em.
Long live American technology!

But at least you'll be making $400K/year in commissions just like the other sales guys. Booyah!

Be grateful he didn't just read an article expounding the virtues of Omega-3 fatty acids. Nuts and fish oil would be been the solution to this problem.