Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:This can get scary: (Score -1, Flamebait) 305

I got a call from a very stressed sounding manager at a store in a bad neighborhood of Albuquerque and explained that the outage was statewide, and I'd already called the next highest level.

His response: "You don't understand! These people carry guns."

Republicans, eh? Since the incident preceded the formation of the Tea Party?

Comment Re:This is disputed (Score 1) 380

The German economies capacity for goods and services is less because of their inefficient energy strategy than it otherwise would be.

So Germany's economic capacity is crippled by their energy costs - and Germany pays their workers twice as much as America does - and Germany still produces twice as many cars as the U.S. does?? And Germany serves as Europe's de facto banker?

Odd. Germany must not have the same caliber of investors, corporate executives, financial and stock market barons, and politicians that so burden America.

Comment Much ado.... (Score 1) 384

I hope nobody out there believes that workers in the various telecommunications corporations ain't never, ever...never ever never eavesdropped on other people's e-communications...for at least as long as there have been long-haul lines.

lolll...QA and QC, donchaknow.

Comment Much ado about nothing... (Score 1) 167

So what if the NSA records everything? Intelligence is only as useful as political leaders want to make it. If political leaders want "actionable intelligence" then the reader should already know that if those political leaders are either crooked or of a totalitarian mindset - or both - and they want to "get" you, they will - even if they have to gin up that "actionable intelligence".

If reading of Stalin's and Mao's purges didn't teach you that, then the still-unsatisfied quest for WMDs and al Qaida training camps in Iraq should have.

What Americans should be worrying about is the threat to themselves that will result from the empowering of a wealthy few - the kind who believe that America isn't a "democracy", it is a "republic" and the only people who should be "represented" by its government are the wealthy (or "job creators", as they like to misname themselves now) - if the American people again put their stooges into elected office. The kind of people who want to destroy government's role as the protector of "the people" - the kind of people, that is, who insist that they are entitled to increase their rate of wealth accumulation even if that requires deregulation/the elimination of laws that now protect "the people"...

That's the kind of people who gin up intelligence...who set records for the dozens of times they say a variation of "I do not recall...". That's the kind of people who alter "the evidence"...be it ASCII or videotape.

Comment Starts off with an invalid assertion (Score 1) 542

"When U.S. presidential candidate Mitt Romney said last year that he was not even going to try to reach 47% of the US electorate, and that he would focus on the 5–10% thought to be floating voters, he was articulating a commonly held opinion: that most voters are locked in to their ideological party loyalty.

Anybody who has ever been around a bunch of individuals who consider themselves to be "of the right", "well-to-do", and "powerful" knows better: Mitt was trying to represent himself as "one of them" by slamming as many of the American people as possible.

lolll...that's what those people holding those beliefs do, especially if they're consuming alcohol. You should hear 'em talk about "unions" (one drink), "labor" (two drinks), and a bizarre mixture of "entitlement spending" and "Perhaps there is something to eugenics..." (three drinks).

Comment Stress, and constant attacks on IT pay (Score 1) 397

Can you think of any other field other than IT where being willing to put in the long hours that excellence sometimes demands results in efforts to dock your pay - but not those hours? That is incredible to me...to deliberately attempt to destroy the motivation of some of America's best and brightest. The results are easy to predict: Just project the same miserly approach upon America's research and development...upon American innovation, which an apt analog as so much of IT's efforts are aimed at doing something "better".

The truth is the United States of America doesn't want to be the world's technology leader anymore...our nation's business leaders - and so their pets in Congress - just want to control the world through their control of the dollar.

That goal is, in my opinion, unusually asinine even for a people and society increasingly constrained by greed given that the dollar can be blown to kingdom come with the simple declaration "Sorry, we don't take dollars anymore." (With the caveat that the statement must come from somebody who has the industrial infrastructure and position as a primary supplier in global trade required to back the value of their proposed dollar replacement.)

That goal of controlling the world through the control of the dollar...it is an open admission that Corporate America's leaders and the politicians who represent them are aware that either they're too lazy or they lack the competence and talent to lead in any other way. Or both.

Comment But...will it change anything? (Score 1) 288

Hard to believe that anything will change. After all, the threat of terrorism was out there and well-known prior to 9/11, but the airlines still shirked all defensive/offensive tactics (even basics like strengthened cockpit doors) in the name of profit - and they got away with it because they liberally dispensed cash to their lobbyists.

I daresay no one will argue an assertion that the liquor industry, as one example of an airport retailer, likewise has a significant lobbying presence in Washington, D.C....et al.

Comment A weird response on the part of the Israelis... (Score 1) 136

[Cyber Bureau bureaucrat] Ben Yisrael said. 'Anonymous doesn't have the skills to damage the country's vital infrastructure. And if that was its intention, then it wouldn't have announced the time of attack. It wants to create noise in the media about issues that are close to its heart,' he said."

On the one hand, a challenge response...on the other hand, a political response designed to defuse.

I guess they're soliciting a mixed response to their response.

Comment Re:Welcome to Capitalism (Score 1) 611

True; it is pointless to argue with the followers of Ayn Rand as the way the mass of them interpret and apply Ayn Rand's philosophy is "I'm in it for me and screw [you]!" (albeit "rational self-interest sounds better) where the set "you" contains an individual, a community, a state, a country, all the nations of the world, or the entire human race - whichever is more personally rewarding for the Rand devotee.

That is how they can justify everything from taking government handouts to poisoning you with pollution in an effort to increase their margins to insisting that those who take government handouts are leeches to those who pollute their own air should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law; their entire universe encompasses "Me!" and no more.

On the flip side, if they use terms like "patriotism", "responsibility", or "loyalty", you can either try to figure out how they're going to benefit from your/the community's/the state's/the nation's compliance with the intended behavior associated with those terms or just start laughing.

Slashdot Top Deals

He who has but four and spends five has no need for a wallet.

Working...