Which is slower, as I mentioned in a reply to another poster who brought this up.
Might not be important to some people, but to me, it's a feature I miss in Mac OS X land.
his is something that most users don't do - they either click on the menu with the mouse or hit shortcuts directly
This is my problem - I do use this manner. It's handy because I don't have to learn the various different short cuts accross different applications. It also allows me to explore the various commands quickly in a new application or get to commands without shortcuts without leaving my keyboard.
control-F2 is something, but it's more keyboard presses to be worth it. As in Control+F2, right, right, right, there is my menu option. So it doesn't allow quick access to actions or exploration without using the mouse.
I know I can configure short cuts to actions I often access, but tbh, I prefer not having too.
When you say contextual menu, you mean the right-click menu?
Cause this isn't what I am talking about.
What I am talking about there is a menu options in Tools -> Options -> Random Area -> Some Option. In Windows (most anyhow, and most linux apps too), the underlines appear when I hold down alt (I used italics to demonstrate where this will be). I can then go Alt + T + U + R and then use arrow buttons to get too Some Option.
How do you do this in Mac OS X?
One of the problems OS X has is that it lacks the ability to use these menus through the keyboard easily. In Windows I can hit the Alt key, and quickly see all the menus I can open by using an other key (the letter used for the menu item will have an underscore). Such as Alt + F is the file menu.
Each menu item then can be accessed usually through an access key. So Alt - F - S would be save. I know in both Windows and Mac OS X you have direct save short cuts too, and you can configure short cuts to common items, but that's not I want.
What I want is to be able to access a menu list from the keyboard quickly while exploring, not remember various different short cuts.
One argument would be the available tool set and support for Java-based technologies is much larger than that of Objective-C.
Additional, the collective knowledge (and hence publications) for Java, is again, larger.
my blog was under DDoS atack, I replace it to http://cyxymu1.livejournal.com/
Obviously this user is used to DDoS and is quite aware of being at the wrong (could say both sides are wrong) end of them.
There will be integer overflow after C++0xFF
Fixed that for you.
"Aww, if you make me cry anymore, you'll fog up my helmet." -- "Visionaries" cartoon