It matters if the person looking at it does, that's all there is to it. Mona Lisa's value isn't determined by the person who values it the least.

There certainly is, many artists stream their process or post timelapses.

Art is nothing without the audience (even if that audience is just the creator) and it's up to the audience to decide if AI art has value or not, or even qualifies as art in the first place. I keep going back and forth on this myself but I certainly value it less than even amateurish human-made art.

The primary benefit of mirrorless might have been price at that point but with significant advances in EVFs and on-sensor autofocus it's clearly more than just a cost-cutting mechanism at this point.

Most but not all of the lag components scale with refresh rate. There is a point where increasing refresh rate won't make much of a difference anymore, where that point is depends on how bad the non-scaling components are. Many input devices and some displays have shockingly bad lag and will dominate total lag even at 60Hz.

The thing with milliseconds is that they add up. 10 ms for input lag here, 10 ms for game logic, 20 ms for triple buffered rendering there, 10 ms for the display and you're talking some blatantly obvious amounts of lag.

Also I reject the notion that it's only about input lag. It really isn't, it's about motion blur from eye movements. Anybody who has used VR with and without reprojection at the same in-game framerate would be able to tell you that. It's far more obvious in VR but the problem is largely the same on flat displays.

They're about visuals, too. It's something you can't unsee once you see it. Look up UFO test and you'll get why it matters immediately. Strobing fixes the UFO tests but if your eyes don't perfectly track the UFO you'll see double images instead so it's more of a hack than a substitute for ultra high framerates.

If Nintendo is worried about somebody reducing their profits they need to take a look in the mirror and FIX THEIR GODDAMN STORE.

A made-up definition by wannabe comedians who failed to be funny.

But it's not.

Neither of which Manning has. They're both exceedingly rare anyway and pretending they have absolutely anything at all to do with the trans fad of recent years is disingenuous and ridiculous.

0 emphasis on the one thing VR does well, cardio exercise. Didn't think I'd see the day when Apple is more out of touch than Zucc.

I got one for Ring Fit Adventure and it's just nowhere near as fun as Wii Fit was, and it's not as good a workout as I can get from VR games like Pistol Whip or Dance Dash either. The only worthwhile experience I had on it was Super Mario Odyssey. Every cross-platform game I got on it thinking I'd play it hand-held I wish I got on Steam instead.

I did at least like the split ergonomics of the joycons, shame there's no real D-pad.

I wouldn't call VR a well served market, there's so much that needs improving. Visual fidelity is low, with narrow FOV and obvious optical aberrations even on the most expensive headsets, headsets are big and uncomfortable, full body tracking even when available at all is kinda garbage etc. etc. I won't even bother to complain about the software since for now I think it's so massively held back by the hardware.

The only thing I still have hopes for is that Valve isn't completely done with VR and that their next headset will be as sanely designed as Vive and Index were.

This is a textbook case of enshittification.

It always starts with the users.