Comment Re:I can think of a few (Score 2, Funny) 496
Yeah, those red access points really do stand out quite a bit. Although, could you imagine the trouble you'd have if they painted them beige or something like that?
Yeah, those red access points really do stand out quite a bit. Although, could you imagine the trouble you'd have if they painted them beige or something like that?
> So stop loading people's computers with so much crap that getting to a productive point takes 10-15 minutes and maybe they'll be more apt to shutdown and reboot for you.
AC has a very good point that I wish some admins would learn. If it takes 15 minutes to boot a machine and get to the point of being sat at a desktop, noone is going to reboot the machine. Thus, you're going to be chasing around, booting the damn things off the network until they reboot and get any waiting updates.
It takes a very special kind of setup to make Windows XP run slower and lock up more than Vista on the same hardware. (Yes, RM, I'm looking at you. Start hiring good programmers, dammit.)
Percussive maintenance?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_Viruses
"...viruses, Trojans, and other threats--specifically written for Linux has been on the increase in recent years and more than doubled during 2005 from 422 to 863."
Also, have a nosey at the list of threats.
Okay, then think about this...
1. What happens if the repo that yum gets the files from is compromised and a new checksum is added? yum won't complain, will it? (Chances are, though, that this will be caught fairly quick (or I'd hope so...) and rectified.)
2. See Above
3. Installs from source? (Okay, assuming the average user can figure out the horribly complex "configure && make && sudo make install" sequence. You never know...)
4. Installs of random
I'm sorry for posting as an AC, but the
Hmm... seems to be working fine here...
"For the man who has everything... Penicillin." -- F. Borquin