Comment Re:Let's put it up on Wikileaks (Score 1) 477
The study is meaningless without more data. You can't derive the correlation between pot and fatal accidents with only the percentage of people involved in fatal accidents that were high. You would need to know how many people at a given time are high in general. As in, if one out of every ten person smoked (10%), then this study actually shows that smoking decreases your chance of a fatal accident. Without that data, we can't know what effect it is actually portraying.
I am not saying there is or isn't a correlation, but I just hate studies that make unfounded conclusions via bad logic. Bad logic in general actually.