Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:gnome better than kde (Score 1) 455

MDIs and dockable toolbars are ugly and annoying

Those little floating toolbars are the most annoying things in the world. Every time I try to do something they're in the way. And I find docked to be much more elegant than something that you can't figure out where to put so you just leave it floating.

I was sooo happy when Photoshop (CS3?) moved to dockable toolbars. They even did a really nice job of it. And they left the choice open to the user. Why restrict someone that might have a different working style?

This is also one of the big things keeping me from using OSX as my main OS. That and the common ribbon menu at the top... Apps should be in their single main window, with the occasional popup.

But I do love the contextual inspector palettes like in M$ Office and SolidWorks.

Comment Re:not really anonymous (Score 1) 231

Well yes. That's my point.

The people behind Wikileaks aren't anonymous, don't need to be, and have chosen not to be. They are trying to provide a way for whistleblowers to be anonymous, which is what would keep someone from coming forward with whatever leak.

So yes, it IS really anonymous for those that want/need to be.

Comment Re:It is not legal to "sell" GPL software, but ... (Score 1) 543

I found a piece of software available for purchase on eBay once. The seller had taken screenshots of some software for simple image editing (or something similar) and blurred out the title bar trying to hide the name. There was still enough information to find out that software he was selling was open source and freely available on sourceforge. I confronted him, using the "Ask seller a question" feature and he replied saying the GPL (or similar) allowed him to charge a fee for providing the software.
Programming

Linux Kernel 2.4 Or 2.6 In Embedded System? 178

snikulin writes "My 6-year-old embedded software happily runs on kernel v2.4 on an XScale CPU. The software gets a bunch (tens of megabytes) of data from an FPGA over a PCI-X bus and pushes it out over GigE to data-processing equipment. The tool chain is based on the somewhat outdated gcc v2.95. Now, for certain technical reasons we want to jump from the ARM-based custom board to an Atom-based COM Express module. This implies that I'll need to re-create a Linux RAM disk from scratch along with the tool chain. The functionality of the software will be essentially the same. My question: is it worth it to jump to kernel 2.6, or better to stick with the old and proven 2.4? What will I gain and what will I lose if I stay at 2.4 (besides the modern gcc compiler and the other related dev tools)?"

Comment Re:The new graphics (Score 1) 305

Then they will be pushed to developing games for linux.

With games developed for a linux based console, it would be an easy switch (if not trivial) to distribute them to linux PCs. That's part of why the windows + xbox releases are so easy to make.

Though M$ likes that they have control over industry and won't give it up without a fight.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Show business is just like high school, except you get paid." - Martin Mull

Working...