Yes. And even the official Mac build (at least, the one I have) is compiled for a PowerPC processor. You can still run it on Intel machines thanks to Rosetta, but it's not ideal.

The question is, will we go for a top kill on the data leak, or will we first attempt more risky solutions which profit the data miners? What kind of concrete do you use to seal a data leak? And what's the conversion factor between the scale of an oil spill and the scale of a data spill? In other words, how do we get from m^2 to BAU (Bad Analogy Units), so we can compare them?

Seconded. Even for Idle, this seems... out of place.

I was raised in the Catholic church, so don't preach to me how Christianity is about "love".

This apple is red. Therefore all apples are red.

Maybe they recognize that there's a ton of open source software that people really want to use, and that easy installs of OSS on Windows adds value to Windows.

Like how they contributed some Linux stuff a while back to make it easier to run Linux in a VM... with Windows as the host machine (I'm not clear on the details, so I'm probably getting the terminology wrong).

"textbooks should be free/open source [...] all schoolchildren own iPads or other e-readers"

I like the idea, but I fear it is unlikely.

"There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable.

There is another theory which states that this has already happened."

What worries me is that all the false positives will make doctors think all positives are false positives. It may not happen often, but this is evidence that it's happened before.

You can't assume every apparently-nonresponsive patient is a dead salmon.

I actually knew it from Oolite, but I figured the universe they share is obscure enough (although with search engines, nothing is obscure for the online reader).

For those not in the know: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elite_%28video_game%29

Someone mod this guy up. Google's funding of multiple browsers makes sense, yet pretty much everyone else assumes it doesn't.

So is it right or wrong to make campaign promises which rely on having power?

Multiple times.