Comment Re:Swiss (Score 4, Informative) 245
Nowhere did the summary say EU.
European != EU.
Nowhere did the summary say EU.
European != EU.
Nowhere did the summary say EU.
European != EU
Now suppose for a minute TPB was largely used to host torrents for child pronography files. Would everyone be leaping to their defense quite as vocally?
They have removed child porn and reported it to the authorities in the past, it caused a lot of controversy due to their "We won't remove any torrents, ever." stance, but they stuck by it.
Also torrenting would be a stupid way to distribute stuff like that, since it's incredibly easy to find the IP address of everyone who downloads it. Although that doesn't mean it doesn't happen
s/the state does not like/who break the law/
States don't have views. Information does not want to be free. Abstract entities don't feel human emotions, and when people pretend they do, I have to ask what point they'd like to make that they can't support with more objective arguments.
The state is not an abstract entity, it's a small group of elected officials, and these people do feel human emotions, and their decisions are affected by them, much of them also have strong ties to corporations, and this affects their decisions too.
Difference is that the seeds are physical property. if they stole your original copies of the book then it's stealing, if they take a COPY then it's pirating.
I'm not saying that pirating is right or wrong here, just that it's very different from literal stealing.
Wow I didn't know this, can you give a citation? I've especially surprised since abortion is illegal here.
you also seem to assume that there are similarly finite dimensions to the assortment of possible algorithms that can be utilized in useful programs. This is not remotely proven.... or even particularly likely. Computers are a very recent development in human history. Given that knowledge and information are being exchanged at exponentially rising rates, we cannot possibly have not even made a significant scratch in the surface of what is possible, or even particularly probable.
So the software works for many common cases PRESENTLY, and it gets UPDATED in the future.
It contains really insecure software, it's a "learn by doing" exercise, much more effective than traditional presentations
Yeah, but big oil companies are nowhere near as bad as the RIAA, so there definitely would've been no problems there.
There shouldn't be bug report for this category of obvious flaws. If you had one look on the desktop you would have seen it.
I'm looking at it right now and don't see it, my clock looks fine, so clearly it's not affecting everyone and it's not obvious just by looking at the desktop.
How would you expect a developer to fix a bug if he's never even seen it, and instead of trying to help you just insult them.
It's called a Macbook, but they're pretty overpriced compared to a regular laptop with same specs, wouldn't recommend it.
Do you still have to rebuild/reinstall modules for Linux for each version of the kernel? That's always awesome
Atleast you don't have to reinstall every driver in Windows each time you've ran Windows update
And before you moderate me flamebait, be sure to understand that it's NOT needed for all other oses.
I've only had to install a driver myself once (Well don't know if I HAD too, but I just googled and followed the first step by step instructions I found) on Ubuntu 6.06, and I'm using a fairly old (GeForce 440 MX) NVidia card, supposedly the worst, now on first boot I get a popup telling me drivers are available and I enter a password and check a box, and kernel updates never caused a problem (except, again, Ubuntu 6.06).
Can I ask when you last used Linux?
Of course it is, but the newbies have to suffer a reboot, only the elite get to keep their uptime even while updating graphics card drivers.
If a thing's worth doing, it is worth doing badly. -- G.K. Chesterton