Comment Re:For disasters (Score 1) 85
That, too. Infrastructure projects like the high-speed rail to Guangzhou and (even more so) the Hong Kong - Macau - Zhuhai bridge (mostly paid for by Hong Kong, which stands to have the least, if any, benefits from the project) are a prime example of that.
The reform package offered by Beijing is worse than what many thought would be a worst-case scenario. As it stands, there is no chance for it to be implemented. Keeping the existing system is a more favourable option for many, as at least in that case it's obvious who's selecting the CE. A public vote on Beijing-sanctioned candidates would give the CE a faux legitimacy.
At the moment it appears the HK and Chinese governments have decided to play the waiting game: hope that the protesters get tired, hope that the people inconvenienced by the protests turn against the protesters, and that the protests will die out naturally. Of course, this will eventually happen, however it's anyone's guess how long the governments are willing to play this game. For the moment the pro-democracy movement appears to have overwhelming public support, some businesses even explicitly allowed their staff to take time off "to do things more important than work".
How it's going to end, I really don't know. I'm quite sure it's not going to be pretty. No matter what, it will be a milestone in Hong Kong's political development.