Comment Re:Philosophical thought experiment (Score 1) 580
If you still support the ban on child pornography then why isn't there a ban on obscene "teen erotica" literature? Why not ban text descriptions, or ban stories which encourage child abuse?
No actual people are physically harmed.
It's funny, because the whole premise of shows like Jackass are stupid people harming themselves on video. I don't see that sort of material becoming "illegal to possess" anytime soon.
With the incredibly broad definition of what constitutes "child pornography" in the U.S., photos taken by teenagers of their own bodies are CP. Any possession of this is a thought crime, and material will still be produced as long as kids have cameras. It's completely unenforceable.