Comment Re:can someone from Europe please explain (Score 1) 146
exactly
it's just such a moronic and absurd concept, forced content delinking
exactly
it's just such a moronic and absurd concept, forced content delinking
I wouldn't want to work for a company who judged me for the stupid shit I did as a teenager or if I were a homosexual.
You are entitled to a private life, but if you make something public, it's public, period. No take backs. Not because I said so but because of the nature of public information.
There is no technological fix for that and Europeans, and yourself, have a deluded "solution" to a reality and a fact of life which is not actually a problem and does not go away, ever.
Own who you are, be ashamed of nothing, including your mistakes. Anyone who would bully you into submission with sensitive areas of your life is no one you should want to associate with and merely an announcement of your own insecurity and weakness.
why anyone thought forced delinking will ever work?
it just draws more attention to what you are trying to delink
it seems so absurd. i can't imagine a group of adults believing in or supporting such a ridiculous concept
i didn't click any of your links. i don't care what shithole you came from. i don't care about you. i care about your ignorant definition of freedom which is clearly wrong, because it is unfortunately rife throughout society and guides many morons' perceptions of right and wrong
your definition of freedom is immature, that of a teenager. no, that's infair to teenagers, as many do appreciate responsibility. but for someone like you, a cognitive immature child, freedom apparently only means some government sticking cattle prongs up your ass or whatever the fuck animates your cold war era fantasies
the simple truth is most impositions on freedom come from irresponsible people around you, those who do not care what they do and how it might limit your freedoms
true freedom is "i can do whatever i want, as long as i don't impinge on the freedom of others"
an immature douchebag thinks "i can do whatever i want, who cares who i hurt or what i damage"
the problem, the abuse that hurts actual freedom, is shitbags who go around constantly ranting about freedom, when their conception of freedom has absolutely nothing to do with actual freedom, and are really the rationalizations of immature children who either are
1. maliciously trying to avoid the consequences of their actions, or
2. are so fucking ignorant they don't understand their actions even have consequences
morons and malicious people are the ones who truly damage the respect for freedom, and they are always the ones whining about "freedom" when they are caught or asked to account for or pay for the consequences of their irresponsibility
take for example the douchebag who blasts his stereo at 3 AM. the guy next door calls the cops, and when they knock on his door, the douchebag is going to whine about tyranny and oppression from above, like you do
when in actuality the only imposition on true freedom, the freedom of the guy trying to get some sleep, is done by the immature douchebag who thinks he can do whatever he wants, who cares about the consequences, that that is "freedom"
this notion that government is only the threat to freedom is equally immature and ignorant. it can often if not mostly come from the immature teenagers like yourself in general society who constantly infringe on the freedom of others. it can also come from the government. but in a civil society with respect for freedom, the cops are usually protecting the rest of us from the freedom destroying losers like the guy who blasts his stereo at 3 AM, morons with a shallow ignorant understanding of what freedom is, like yourself
a sense of responsibility is the only way you arrive at a true mature understanding of what freedom is. if everyone were responsible, there would be no need for laws, or government
but unfortunately we need laws and government, to keep immature children like yourself who whine about tyranny and oppression because the cops told you you can't play your stereo at 3 AM
it is really quite simple: you don't know what freedom is. you are an immature child who whines and pouts because there are natural limits on what you can do in life: the freedoms of others around you
my eyes dimmed with skepticism then completely rolled over here
They can't make a faith-based or political comment on a web page.
why is it that you ignorant hysterical fucks just lie?
you have no idea what freedom is
really
you're an immature teenager
I should have added: I have 0 interest in paying for anybody else's service under the gun of a government thug.
good for you you fucking moron
i take it you don't drive since auto insurance is mandatory
the insurance is mandatory because the us government is a conspiracy to take away your freedom for laughs... i mean, avoiding the low iq paranoid schizophrenic mental diarrhea of braindead retards... it is that way because nobody likes a freeloading asshole who causes great damage and then can't pay the fucking bill
just like it is with health insurance you blind dumb mentally ill fuck
freeloading is not freedom
this is the absolute truth: you don't even understand what freedom is
you confuse it with irresponsibility. you are an immature shallow dimwit
the founding fathers were extremely skeptical of religion
you will remember (if you are educated) that much of the 1600s in europe were spent with catholics murdering protestants and protestants murdering catholics and many perturbations in between. because "it came from god" as you say meant different things to different violent bigots, and they were therefore entitled to murder those who did not believe as they did. much like the reason daesh (ISIS) gives for murdering shias today
most of the first europeans to come to these shores were in fact fleeing such religious persecution. which is not a cute word for "tut tutting and walking by sternly" but mass murder
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
this is why the very first amendment, the establishment clause states:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...
essentially, your thinking and your words are anathema to the foundation of this country
the historical lesson was very clear to the founding fathers of what you have when religion dictates government: mass murdering hell
btw, i mean it when i say the founding fathers were extremely skeptical of religion:
http://hwarmstrong.com/christi...
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2...
If I break my arm, I will go to the hospital and pay for the service
i stopped reading there
do you understand the reality of the topic you are injecting your ignorance into?
here is where you did that:
By international standards, even the Democratic party is to the right on a lot of issues (mostly economic at this point) than the rest of the developed world.
http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
you need a secretary to keep track of your own bullshit from comment to comment?
you're making an absolute judgment on the entire society, when the only logically valid determinant of left and right is within the society itself
regardless of the fact you think a phrase like "developed world" makes your arbitrarily determined authority valid in any way. as if economic output and ideological "purity" go hand in hand
1. if you don't have health insurance and you break your arm, your shallow immature teenaged "principles" will quickly give way to pain and you will go to the hospital
2. at the hospital, we will not turn you away because our policies are not social darwinistic cruelty, in spite of assorted sadistic dim bulbs like yourself wanting then to be
3. then you will avoid the bill, or declare bankruptcy
so in your words, you don't champion freedom, you champion freeloading, you low iq douchebag crackpot
there is nothing in the concept of freedom that champions irresponsibility. in fact, if everyone in society were responsible, there would be no need for laws or government, and everyone would be absolutely free
maximizing freedom goes hand in hand with maximizing responsibility. the only ones who are "oppressed" (ie, told they can't freeload off of others) are the irresponsible immature teenagers like yourself who need to understand how a truly free and responsible person navigates life: don't make me pay for your healthcare because you are an irresponsible child
did you read what you replied to?
my point is simply a refutation of the social conservative fallacy that homosexuality is "unnatural"
read. then reply
"in which i continue to change the topic and think i'm still making a point"
let's see if i can play your game:
your'e wrong because doctors in the uk don't use stethoscopes as much as in the usa. which proves that the american healthcare system has the best pancreatic treatment regime in the world. so we can conclude that the australian doctor supply is weak and therefore single payer is an absolute failure
how am i doing following your argumentative "style"?
Do not use the blue keys on this terminal.