I imagine that there are parts of a given ride where you can safely deploy a 'selfie stick'; but what kind of idiot waves a pole around when moving at nontrivial speed near walls, beams, etc. that the pole can catch on? Roller coasters are designed not to subject you to unsafe levels of acceleration or deceleration; but that does not include sticking to speeds that are safe it a modestly rigid pole abruptly couples your moving, and squishy, body to an immobile structural element.

If you are lucky, you bought a cheap crap stick, and it will snap(and not send a sharp end into anyone's eye) before some part of your body does; but that's not really a gamble you want to take just for a lousy picture of yourself.

The little racket of selling pictures of the riders, taken by fixed cameras installed at strategic points, probably helped contribute to this decision, doing well by doing good and all that; but what a stupid idea.

Do people also take care to wear ponytails and/or ties when near rotating equipment? And dangle loose clothing over any exposed gears and belts they find? Or do we have people who've never met a machine more dangerous than an iPad or a minivan and just don't think?

I would find it extremely surprising, though more extremely surprising for some areas of their workforce than for others. However, the 1 woman figure is among new black employees only(of which there were only 7); not new employees workforce wide, for which TFA doesn't give a number; but provides some percentages indicating a modest increase in proportion of female workforce.

My suspicion is that facebook is doing some "good cultural fit" selection; but 1 black woman, of 7 black hires, is much more plausible than 1 woman, of 1,231 hires.

'Genocide'? I am more than ready to roll my eyes at assorted doomed feel-good initiatives; but until I can bask in the warm glow of the honkie ovens, this 'genocide' sounds like puffery.

I think the question is not 'is there a problem?' but 'is it Facebook's problem, or is something else picking them off earlier in the production chain such that Facebook's hiring is simply an accurate representation of the candidates it has to work with?'

Facebook is large enough that it has probably outgrown the most blatant 'Our hiring process is that you were the CEO's frat bro at Stanford, bro.' school of startup HR; but the question remains whether they've gone slightly more subtle, or whether they are even-handedly hiring from a field that, for reasons not under their control, has basically nothing to choose from if you are looking for a 'diversity' hire.

Either way there arguably exists a problem; but assuming that it's all facebook's fault is way easier than addressing the fact that, with rare exceptions, there's a pretty yawning gulf between a good American education and a lousy one.

If your resistors are large enough to have intelligible markings(and you don't have an excuse involving heroically sized bleed resistors for some excitingly dangerous looking apparatus), your ship probably sailed a decade ago, maybe 15 years.

Multiplication is timeless, at least.

Apparently, Facebook outsources a lot of its moderation tasks, via a Mechanical Turk like system, to whatever grim hellhole is cheapest; but still has internet access.

I suspect that they could...impressively boost...their diversity numbers if they were just able to find a way of counting those as 'employees' without actually paying them more. The effect would probably be even stronger than any benefit Apple gets from including their retail sales/support minions in the numbers.

Saving the corals might actually be the easy part: It wouldn't be a fun job, unless you are a real saltwater aquarium masochist; but taking 'cuttings' and propagating them in captivity is reasonably well understood, at least for the ones that have historically merited the attention. Even if you can't modify them to make them more durable, there is lots of ocean currently too cold for a given coral ecosystem that, if warmed, will become a viable location for transplants from the areas that are becoming too warm(the current cold-water reefs, which do exist; but don't get the attention of the tropical ones, may be pretty screwed, Rost reef, in the frigid waters off Norway, will be pining for the fjords).

However, much of the charm of coral reefs is the amount of ecosystem that they support. All sorts of weird stuff, the stuff that eats it, and so on to the top of the food chain. Transporting that, or convincing it to swim in the right direction, will be a much greater challenge. Plus, unlike the fecund swarms of tiny organisms, where 'genetic diversity' fits in a medium fish tank, and could probably re-mutate from a monoclonal strain in a matter of decades; larger organisms lose genetic diversity much more easily as individuals die, and don't recover nearly as easily. Some of the larger fish, say, will be will be a pretty inbred and sorry lot(exquisitely vulnerable to disease, as monocultures always are), if most of them die and a new population is seeded from a few transplants.

If there were some sort of payoff in it, we could probably have 'coral farms' up and running in short order; but they'd have roughly the same resemblance to natural reefs that tree farms producing papermill feedstock do to mature forests, or alfalfa fields do to prairies.

I'd be curious to know how well they deal with pH changes. We already know, from observing coral bleaching during short term warm periods, that they are touchy and somewhat feeble; but the survivors are capable of recolonizing, or building atop depending on the details, the skeletons of their fallen.

If those structures come under attack, or if wringing calcium ions out of the water becomes more difficult and energy intensive, they may have larger problems. As might, unfortunately, a surprisingly large number of other ecologically important aquatic organisms. That could really be a downer.

Deeper seas means exciting new shallow-ocean areas replacing such formerly dessicated locations as 'Florida' and 'The Netherlands, except that they actually believe in civil engineering over there, so maybe not'. This presents its own problems, of course; but the geometry of the earth's land area simply doesn't allow you to deepen-out the existing shallow areas without opening up new shallow areas; unless you have wrath-of-an-old-testament-god-in-a-genocidal-mood amounts of water available.

You know how it is in the handset market, people just stop caring and start phoning it in after a while.

It's also an oddball small(by the standards of what's inside) form factor case. That likely takes the upper end of what they do make out of consideration on thermal grounds. The i7-4790K is a 90watt part, and AMD's thermally equivalent options compare even less favorably.

On-access scans are probably making everyone's disk access a joy even if no scheduled scans are running at the moment. Unfortunately, those can't be deferred(unless you are OK with receiving the results of any disk access attempts the next morning); and are probably the most valuable scans, since they actually have a shot at intercepting something before the user runs or loads it.

There may be some incremental improvements that the security people are stonewalling on; but certainly nothing that is going to make using an HDD fun again, so they are likely loath to provide any false hope that will make deferring SSD upgrades even easier to justify.

Perhaps Lenovo, even if they don't actually build this particular widget, should think very carefully about the fact that "Hey, what if we released a product that was just like what Thinkpads were before we started fucking with them?" is the most exciting idea they've had in a long time.

That may not be fun feedback; but it's important to know your strengths; and your limits.

So Warner Brothers either has management that hasn't learned that the only thing more expensive than doing the job correctly is totally fucking it up; or some raving lunatic who thinks that he has finally cracked the miracle of 100% efficient software development?

That's quite a brain trust. You'd think that they'd be either more bankrupt or smarter by now.

I'm just wondering how the game is so badly broken for people attempting to run it on an x86 with AMD drivers and Microsoft APIs, when there apparently exists an xbox version that 'works' by the standards of shrinkwrap software.

I do realize that the xbox does not run Windows(in any meaningful sense, they probably borrowed from NT rather than anything else when they needed OS bits; but it's a pretty specialized selection); But there are substantial similarities in both hardware and software between the two; and it's not as though both first and 3rd party engines, middleware, etc. weren't largely able to paper over much, much, weirder differences last generation.