People who need to call international will like this a lot though.
A circle is really hard to read and jumping away from the center and then counterclockwise to get to the next "row" is wacky. If you can't read the numbers very well, you won't be able to tell what order the elements are in.
Won't it look nice on a Zune HD (chemistry edition) though?
Well, switch to SAS drives, and replace each 1.5T sata with 3 450G SAS with 1,500,000, and you will also have drives fail at the same rate. (3x longer mtbf but 3x more disks). Seems like you are really criticizing lack of tiered storage, rather than consumer grade hardware here.
Additionally, if you RTFA, you would see that they were using RAID6 + a hot spare and have split up their arrays so they are not too big and do not end up with ridiculous rebuild times. A RAID6 + HS solution will not lose data with a double drive failure, and can handle three drives out so long as the first parity segment has been rebuilt by the time the third drive fails.
Clearly this solution would not work for most enterprise needs. It is just disk based backup, and with the hardware they are using, it is just barely "online", but certainly far more "online" than tape would be.
On top of all that, the company explains what they are doing, so their customers know exactly what they are getting into. You do not pay $5/month for unlimited backup and expect to get a high-end tiered backup system with high availability.
Computer Science is merely the post-Turing decline in formal systems theory.