Yes back in the day.. pre-internet.. I read on the UK's The Sun the title
NUT STAB HELL BLAME
oh so evocative and poetic!

Rude slashdotters like you are the reason I don't comment here any more. Go be passive aggressive elsewhere.

This has happened all over London as well. In the 4 years I was there.. i used to know of about 25 pieces.. and when i left they were down to about 7. The small "Rats" have a particular knack of getting painted over.. they are all gone, bar one that I know of, in London.

I was annoyed by this statement enough to write that text-based MUDs (Multi-User dungeons) were doing massive multiplayer RPGs long before Neverwinter nights.. and they had customizable guilds as well!
If you're going to write an article about unsung game heroes at least sing about the actual heroes!

... who have zero support on weekends.. got a problem with a game key on Saturday? You've gotta wait until Monday to resolve it. Thanks Stardock!

I can't believe with all that time they've got up there, they wasted their first tweet not writing

That's one small tweet for man. One giant tweet for mankind.

He is.

I think i speak for everyone when I say this

WTF!??!?

No it does not mean that, you buffoon. I never said I'm ALWAYS looking for new work.. I said WHEN I'm looking for new work. As it happens I have 2 passports and green card. I change countries and I also contract. Contracts aren't always forever.

This is funny because it's true! I USED to be a Delphi developer, but the work started drying up in Australia and I changed over to .Net

I have never looked back. My skills are always in demand. When I am looking for a new job, I get one in days.

In breaking news!! A new search website has been released called "Google"

*clap* *clap* Well done. I must confess, that I thought I almost had won that encounter, but your insightful rebuttal has completely obliterated my argument.
You have just totally proven me right with your weakest.response.ever.

"Nope." is Myopic's Win-All answer to this topic

[Citation needed] It is underhanded of you to cherry-pick definitions to support only your argument
Webster Dictionary describes it as:
2) racial prejudice or discrimination (a.k.a "the act, practice, or an instance of discriminating categorically rather than individually")
So now that we have citations and more definitions.. it is clear that not allowing a monkey picture of someone because of their race is clearly discriminating by a category (their race) instead of on their personal merit of resembling a monkey.
You are supporting a racist argument. You really are. You think you're doing the right thing, but you're merely perpetuating stereotypes.

If you're going to call someone daft.. you'd better make sure you make sense.
Racism is to treat someone differently because of their race.. and to specifically not compare someone to a monkey because of their race is as equally racist as to compare someone to a monkey because of their race.
You're too blind (or is it myopic?) to see that you are in fact being racist. Think about it for a second next time.