Comment Re:MIT Gaydar should be Facebook app (Score 1) 508
The whole topic of gay and not gay has always been interesting to me because the line of thought is alien to me. I consider myself hyper-straight in the sense that I have been sexually attracted to women since before the age of 4... I always knew I liked looking at women... I liked the way their pants fit
So given this new mind-twister, the MIT Gaydar makes assumptions based on what? I'd be interested to know. Surely it can't be based on associations alone. If all my friends were black, would that indicate that I am also black? My tendency to burn in the sunlight would tend to disagree with that. I'd be interested to know how MIT defines gay to better understand how it makes determinations.
If you don't know what features women look for in men, how can you make yourself attractive to them? If you don't know the system, how can you game the system to work for you?
Maybe you can't see what's sexually attractive in men, but you'd still recognise an attractive man - every human in the world has the ability to recognise attractive humans regardless of gender.
Now take that consideration and apply attractive==sexy and you know what it's like to be gay. Bravo.