Comment Re:So. (Score 1) 457
Just curious, but how did the court verify that the emails were indeed genuine? I would think a good lawyer would be able to challenge that and get them thrown out.
Just curious, but how did the court verify that the emails were indeed genuine? I would think a good lawyer would be able to challenge that and get them thrown out.
During the height of the IRA bombing campaign in London we took reasonable steps (don't leave unattended bags anywhere, etc) to reduce the risks but in general we just got on with it. That is by far the best way for society to deal with these sorts of problems.
It's interesting how you bring up the response to the IRA bombing campaign as "reasonable". But isn't that the catalyst for the "ring of steel" CCTV system implemented in London?
Just because we think being offended by Mohammed images is silly, doesn't mean that it doesn't piss other people off. The closest thing that could compare Mohammed images to would be the N-word for Americans. It is just a simple word, but it has alot of power. I could easily imagine riots over this word. Basically, not everyone looks at the world in the same way. Does it justify murder? Of course not, but you might see why this might be upsetting...
Does anyone have a picture of this thing? It would be really interesting to see how it works.
I'm guessing this is the same strategy employed by the native americans. In the end, it never really mattered, only delayed things for a bit. I think if the aliens were interested in colonization, we're pretty much screwed.
The linked article seems to disagree with you:
Stanford University's Irving Weissman has injected human neural stem cells from aborted fetuses into the brains of fetal mice, where they have integrated and grown into human neurons and glia that intermingle with mouse brain cells, making up about 1 percent of the tissue in their brains.
I'm assuming most people here won't have a problem with this research. But truly, where is the line? What about injecting human brain cells into mice? How about into chimps? Do we have any moral obligations not to cross this line? I am in awe and at the same time terrified about the future.
This article raises some of these questions. It's quite interesting that it was written in 2004. It even mentions the FOXP2 gene.
http://www.reason.com/news/show/34941.html
I don't think the problem is climate change per se. It's more the rapid rate of change. If some of the predictions are true, and climate/sea level changes dramatically within our lifetimes, then things could be pretty bad for alot of people. Will Canada and Russia take in all the Bangladeshis once sea level rises and most of Bangladesh disappears? Well, they may have to...
25 people so far. The funny thing about the flu is it's potential for exponential growth.
Can this be what brings string theory from realm of math into the realm of science? (testable hypotheses and all that)
I am interested to read more about this incident. Do you have more information, like the name of the scientist?
Thanks.
After the last of 16 mounting screws has been removed from an access cover, it will be discovered that the wrong access cover has been removed.