They did put it out on Android. Meaning that people still have access to their game. Hell, on their site they have a link to Google Play AND a link directly to the APK.

Nobody said you were entitled to things being easy.

Because that's what they agreed to when they started developing the game, and that's what iOS users agreed to when they bought their device.

This group could have easily made their game for Android, not had to deal with any of this bullshit, and reached a larger audience.

And as it turns out, they have. Their message has still gotten out, and people still have the ability to experience it.

Treating employees like people hurts the "job creators"

Most of the anti-vaxxers will trust a thoroughly debunked, redacted, and even admittedly made up report over what the government says.

That would be for things using .NET. Legacy native code, written in C/C++, would have to be recompiled.

But why would Amazon care to do that?

It didn't become closed source either.

That statement is idiotic, if only for the implication that the only reason people were using Android is because it was FLOSS, and not because it was better at some things than iOS. Which means that people would be willing to use an admittedly worse system just because it's "open".

No, because CM doesn't create their own SDK.

Ebayed netbooks. 11" Ultrabooks.

Catering to your specific hardware desires is not their concern.

A few people care. Most do not.

Really? Your ability to care about something that most people don't makes you smarter?

Wait, how is Amazon's device a "walled garden"? You can still sideload apps onto it. Sure, there's an approval process to get into their store, but so what? Should the owner of a store not be able to decide what they sell in their store?

No, it doesn't. The "free market" does not depend on people copying the works of others.

As an Android App Developer, how exactly does this change affect me? How does it make me unable to make the applications I was making before?