"Any "professional" who uses the word "abuse" shouldn't be working in the industry. It's a sign of ignorance and low intelligence."
No, moron, it's actually a CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS. But you're a fucking idiot, so you wouldn't know that.
The diagnosis of "addiction" was revised, because too many of the behaviors needed for diagnosis were not present in cases that were clearly clinically significant.
So TWO diagnoses were created to discern the difference between those people with impending problems, versus those with what would have been classically called "addiction".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substance_abuse
"By 1994, The fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) issued by the American Psychiatric Association ,the DSM-IV-TR, defines substance dependence as "when an individual persists in use of alcohol or other drugs despite problems related to use of the substance, substance dependence may be diagnosed." followed by criteria for the diagnose[4]
DSM-IV-TR defines substance abuse as:[5]
A. A maladaptive pattern of substance use leading to clinically significant impairment or distress, as manifested by one (or more) of the following, occurring within a 12-month period:
Recurrent substance use resulting in a failure to fulfill major role obligations at work, school, or home (e.g., repeated absences or poor work performance related to substance use; substance-related absences, suspensions or expulsions from school; neglect of children or household)
Recurrent substance use in situations in which it is physically hazardous (e.g., driving an automobile or operating a machine when impaired by substance use)
Recurrent substance-related legal problems (e.g., arrests for substance-related disorderly conduct)
Continued substance use despite having persistent or recurrent social or interpersonal problems caused or exacerbated by the effects of the substance (e.g., arguments with spouse about consequences of intoxication, physical fights)
B. The symptoms have never met the criteria for Substance Dependence for this class of substance.
The fifth edition of the DSM, planned for release in 2010, is likely to have this terminology revisited yet again. Under consideration is a transition from the abuse/dependence terminology. At the moment, abuse is seen as an early form or less hazardous form of the disease characterized with the dependence criteria. However, the APA's 'dependence' term, as noted above, does not mean that physiologic dependence is present but rather means that a disease state is present. Many involved recognize that the terminology has often led to confusion, both within the medical community and with the general public. The American Psychiatric Association requests input as to how the terminology of this illness should be altered as it moves forward with DSM-V discussion."
It seems you're totally wrong and a fucking idiot.
"BTW, I won't be replying with any more completely idiotic Trolls."
FYP
Do yourself a favor, before you decide to run your fucking mouth, make sure that you're not completely wrong about everything you've said, so you don't look like a colossal fucking imbecile.
Like you did here.
See, professionals don't use the word "addiction" any more than a doctor would diagnose someone as "having the vapors".
If you weren't so insistent on remaining an ignorant cunt, you'd have learned that.