Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Android is worse (Score 1) 391

I don't see a problem with it the comparison. Age is not an excuse for a lack of reliability. In fact an older device should be more reliable because it's had a chance to go through major updates and bug fixes. If I was complaining about poor performance then yeah it would be a bad comparison; but that's not what I'm complaining about.

It looks like Google isn't getting any better at this stuff too.

Comment Android is worse (Score 2) 391

I had a Motorola Milestone (international version of the original Droid) for a while, now running a Lumia 800. The Milestone would die at least once a day, and the battery would last maybe 10 hours if I left it completely alone. Even though the Milestone was a flagship Android phone at one point, I could write a giant TL;DR post about the problems I had with that phone.

My Lumia gets over 30 hours of battery on a single charge and has yet to crash or even do anything unexpected in the 6 months I've owned it. The difference in the quality of the phones is so night and day I can't imagine that a WP8 phone would be any worse than an Android.

Comment Re:DOA without WebGL (Score 1) 187

Sure, but we already have native clients for SETI. They are vastly more efficient then any Javascript implementation. I'm sure if they care about speed they care about not wasting half their available cycles on parsing Javascript. How many people are going to leave a browser tab open vs download the client that runs in the background? Besides, not being able to run SETI in a browser tab is hardly a reason to claim a browser is DOA.

Comment Re:DOA without WebGL (Score 1) 187

Only partially trolling. I'm just waiting for you to explain why anyone should solve those problems in a browser instead of doing it server side and shipping the results to the browser. Like others have said, GLSL is compiled in kernel mode by the video drivers. Exposing kernel mode code to the internet is the worst idea from a security perspective since ActiveX. In fact I would say it's worse since video drivers get next to no security hardening and ActiveX at least ran in user mode.

Comment Re:Grin (Score 5, Informative) 360

is there a reason for not making the front ends dynamic libraries which could be linked by any program that wants to parse source code?

Quoth the Stallman himself:

One of our main goals for GCC is to prevent any parts of it from being used together with non-free software. Thus, we have deliberately avoided many things that might possibly have the effect of facilitating such usage, even if that consequence wasn't a certainty. We're looking for new methods now to try to prevent this, and the outcome of this search would be very important in our decision of what to do.

Not only is the poor design true, it was very intentional. This is why we need the LLVM project. KDevelop and such shouldn't have to write their own compiler front ends to get feature parity with Visual Studio; but right now they do.

Slashdot Top Deals

I think there's a world market for about five computers. -- attr. Thomas J. Watson (Chairman of the Board, IBM), 1943

Working...