Comment Re:Not a "right"! (Score 1) 312
No not really. The earth was empty. Then homo sapiens filtered out from Southern Africa and laid claim to all these empty spaces. Whoever arrived first claimed ownership, created farmland, and passed it down from father to son to grandson (or sold it to neighbors). The concept of "first to arrive, first to lay claim to the property" is an ancient concept that predates written history.
Have you considered the idea that what could be considered a natural right back when people *could* find still unused empty spaces, is no longer such when there is no more good land left unused, and when humanity has already spread all over the world?
Discovery of new territories is all fine and good -- and I can understand the argument "If you don't like your lot in life, go move further out and find new land".
But to believe the same applies now, where the above (finding unused land) is no longer practical means favoring the established owners over the new owners -- and the heirs over the self-created.
It fails criteria of both justice and equality.
No not really. My knowledge of that history is foggy, but it sounds like the Emperor violated the natural rights of whoever originally owned the land. He basically stole it from those farmers. He infringed upon their rights.
But by that argument there's hardly an square inch of soil in Europe (possibly the world) that wasn't once grabbed forcefully by their previous owners. Where does that leave modern ownership of property as a concept, except merely a human convention driven by democratically-written law, not a natural right at all?