Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Normally... (Score 1) 791

I can't add anything to the RF debate, but be aware that being next to any major bit of infrastructure can be a real pain in the ass.

It will need fixing, and since phone companies show contempt for us all, you can assume that if it's cheaper and easier to make your life hell with noise etc, when they do maintenance or upgrade work, then that is what they will do.

You might believe in aliens, homeopathy or the existence of Sarah Palin's brain, but can you imagine a supervisor at a telco saying "no we can't do the work now, it might wake people up".

That won't always be 'working hours' either, you might never notice a drill during the day, but at 4AM you will.

Submission + - Guy Kewney, long serving IT journo has cancer (pelicancrossing.net)

DCFC writes: Guy Kewney, the longest serving IT journalist in Britain (probably the world), has serious cancer, (as opposed to the really funny unserious kind). Since he is a freelancer that has had a catastrophic effect upon his earnings, but he still makes a contribution to the tech world.
His work has helped us all try to make sense of technology, from his time at PC Magazine, PCW, to many others, his stories has been slashdotted any number of times, he's far from dead, but support for him is well deserved.

NOTE: I don't know how exactly the editing system on /. works but you've used his stories enough that a link back at this time would be step to equalisation.
 

Submission + - Open Source in Investment Banks (watersonline.com)

DCFC writes: Quietly, OSS has been digging deep into the major banks. Areas like algorithmic trading are now dominated by Linux, and developers routinely build their solutions using GCC and other free development tools. They now understand that the quality of a system is driven by the level of people who build and maintain it, and that correlates weakly with the size of the suppler. Many banks are really quite anxious about being at the mercy of Oracle MySQL falls into its hands.

Of course you can choose for yourself whether it is good or bad that banks make major financial decisions using powerful open source tools...

Robotics

Submission + - Wheelchair gunman surrenders to police robot (thisislondon.co.uk)

DCFC writes: Police had negotiated with Taylor by phone, but he made no demands other than a request for a pizza. He surrendered after a day-long hostage drama at a US post office, which seems a suboptimal place to order Pizza from, but I'm only a Brit so what do I know ?
Warren Taylor, who had reportedly entered the building pushing the chair while claiming to be carrying explosives, gave himself up and released three people he was holding.

Submission + - Microsoft tells UK schools: buy our software, save (channelregister.co.uk)

kel5ash writes: Microsoft's UK education chief insisted yesterday that schools would continue to lap up its software despite tightening budgets and a likely change of government — and education policy — in the next few months.

In an interview with The Register at the Bett (British Educational Training and Technology) event in London, the company's UK director of education, Steve Beswick, said the schools' sector was still keenly sniffing around its products and added that Windows 7 and the upcoming Office 2010 suite had helped buoy demand.

"Competition is good, we have to compete with lots of open source software and that's fine," he said.

"Lots of our customers look at the value our software is bringing — it's not just about the cost.

"Yes, there is a charge, albeit we are discounting our software for education in a big way, by about 80 per cent in fact. But clearly schools need to look at the over all costs, and in our experience many of them prefer to work in a Windows environment."

His defensive comments came in response to recent lukewarm government assurances about its open source and open standards strategy, that many OSS vendors hoped would help jar the public sector competition door open.

"It's not just about procurement," said Beswick, who was keen to justify why Microsoft deserved to be ahead of the open source pack.

Google

Submission + - China Emphasizes Laws as Google Defies Censorship (pcworld.com)

Lomegor writes: Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu said on Thursday that all companies are welcome to operate in China but that they must do so under local laws. Although not explicitly, this is in some way a response to Google threat to leave the country. China also stated that they strict cyber laws and that the it forbids any kind of "hacking attack"; when asked if those laws apply to the government as well it was quickly avoided.
"It is still hard to say whether Google will quit China or not. Nobody knows," the official in the State Council Information Office was quoted as saying.

Submission + - Best Buy $39.95 optimization exposed as a scam (consumerist.com)

DCFC writes: The Consumerist deconstructs the appliing scam that Best Buy call "optimzation". BB charge 40 bucks to give you a slower PC, and make bizarre claims that it makes it go 200% faster.
Yes, 200% faster.

Submission + - Shoudl you put your religion on your resume ? (theregister.co.uk)

DCFC writes: Should you put your religion on your CV / Resume, when applying for a job in a bank ?

That's a hard question, but important in these troubled times, a headhunter for investment bankers wades into this.

Comment Re:We don't see ones and twos because.... (Score 1) 169

I agree, but I think we both get some entertainment from reviews of crap.
Also it would warn people away from wasting their money.
Games are not cheap, and some are bought by wholly clueless adults for children. A grandparent who thinks they are buying a real treat, only to see the kids face drop hard deserve a bit of objective advice.

Comment Does anyone really believe the scores ? (Score 4, Insightful) 169

If a magazine or website is really scoring out of 10 or out of 100, then we ought to see some 1's and 2's.
But we don't do we ?

The researchers would find more utility in measuring the correlation between ad spend and score.

Anyone think these two variables don't correlate strongly ?

Comment Re:It's not a win, it's a better fight. (Score 1) 498

>You don't spend $30 million dollars and purchase a company if you aren't moving your software to that platform.

I did explicitly say that the quality of IT decisions at the LSE were terrible...

But yes, you do, indeed I did a similar thing when I ran the development of trading systems elsewhere. The existing system that I inherited was a pain to develop so I spent money on a parallel development to see if that would go better. As it happened we could replace it, but this was an experiment, not a deterministic plan.

This is a common pattern in large scale s/w development. Big firms often have competing product development teams, or there may be major components where you spend real money so that at the end of the day you have a high chance that at least one works. This is not limited to s/w, car firms may have different engine teams, and Intel has any number of groups that are in effect competing.
And yes, the losing effort is in a sense "wasted", but it is an insurance premium.

I wonder is there a book on the management of large scale s/w development (>100 developers) ?

>This process is much further along the road than you seem to think.
You must remember that I'm a headhunter of Old London town, also as it happens someone who has done Unix porting and debugged MS source code, so actually I get to hear lots of things, and although I agree that the reason for buying this thing is that it may be close to maturity it will require substantial customisation.

I also do occasional consultancy for banks, (although obviously not for the LSE), and the first question I asked when LSE people told me about this move was "where are the programmers" ?

It did not surprise me that they were overseas, though the footprint in London was so small I wondered how they could possibly support a system where direct feedback from the users is so important.
But as far as I can tell, this was "business driven". Forgive me I don't know what industry or country you are in, but for me this means that they had nice discussions with senior management, perhaps over golf.

I would bet money that there is no lock-in for the developers, who may walk, indeed the lack of programmer involvement that I perceive (as an outsider) does not exclude the possibility that they have walked away already. They possess skills (high speed C++ for trading) that is actually in some demand, even in this tighter market, and by moving to London and working for one of my clients they could earn literally 5 to 10 times as much money. Yes, really, I do this for a living.

It's quite easy to lock such developers in, you give them money in a form that makes leaving unattractive.

By "easy", I mean it is not hard to understand this process, it is in fact "hard" because the politics of the firm typically are horrible, and I won't be the only headhunter sharking around these people.

Open source does not protect you from catastrophic staff loss. This will be a huge body of code, and even if it is well documented and designed will be tough for good people to come in cold.
But of course being an outsourced project it will be very very difficult for them to get good people since the project is in a low cost country where real time trading is unknown to pretty much everyone outside this team. You ought to get people from London or NY to pug gaps, but that will be expensive,and thus avoided until it is too late.

As the above might show, I have experience of death march projects...

Comment It's not a win, it's a better fight. (Score 0) 498

It's more complex than this...

Firstly, the costs will go up, not down.
That's because they don't trust the new solution to deliver, so for quite some time they will run both developments.
*If* the systems is good enough then they migrate, but the LSE track record on technology is either funny or shameful, but certainly I would count them picking your system as an "endorsement" of the same order as being Bernie Madoff's accountant...

Next of course, it is not an open source solution, Oracle is not open source, trust me on this.

The critical term here is latency, the LSE wants as much algotrading as it can get, and a barrier to this has been the fact that Accenture has been "helping". (Imagine Bernie Madoff having a system built by the Goa'uld,, powerful, evil but ultimately doomed). It will not shock any Accenture watchers that the CIO of the LSE had been an Accenture employee.

So what we have is a more interesting thing, a competition between a partly open source system and .NET.

It is possible, maybe even likely that the .NET solution will be beaten, but that has not happened yet. MS can be expected to fight back, pride intersects with commercial interests here, Oracle is no more friend of MS than Linux.

I am no fan of MS, but it saddens me when open source fanbois distort facts to make it look like they've won, even when the real story offers an opportunity to beat their "enemies" in a more conclusive way.

Comment Re:Profits, but for whom? (Score 1) 624

>But we now have clear evidence that the real >cost to society of these behaviors is not in >billions but in trillions of dollars.

I will introduce you to a piece of advice I give to newbie bankers (I headhunt maths geeks for banks).

*Every cent* a banker makes is by providing some sort of service. Some of it is obvious stuff like interest, fees for advice or moving the stuff from one place to another, or carry out a specific trade for a customers personal holdings.

But liquidity and price discovery are services as well, even if you are not allowed to know who you are providing them to.

A major problem at the moment is the lack of liquidity and price discovery, we have in effect regressed to the 1950s.
To take your analogy of the US army, it provides security to many people who it does not know by name, but who still exist. It is also in the nature of armies that they provide security to people who not only do not thank them, but fight them for doing so.

Of course like armies, banks screw up sometimes. Armies attack the wrong enemies, banks buy the wrong stocks or lend money to the wrong people.

>The average bonus on WS less than a year after these companies were going bankrupt was over half a million dollars.

That simply untrue. Have you been watching Fox news ?

>Lay 6,000 people off and get a 100,000,000 dollar bonus. But you can only buy 5 or 6 tv's and 3 or 4 cars. So overall demand for product is reduced.

That's true, but you have not asked what else can be done with the money ? Most gets spent or taxed.

>I now have 4 friends laid off and three who are on the edge of being laid off.

I've been let go myself, more than once. Not nice. no one has ever found a solution to this. Most of the tries have left a notable % of the population dead.

>It's like ignoring the price of having the U.S. Army all over the world protecting oil interests in the real price of oil.

Again the numbers do not support this.
A critical reason the US has had such a poor time in Iraq is that nearly all the US armed forces have been doing something else.
There is not much oil in Germany, Hawaii, Afghanistan, Korea, Japan and many other places US troops are to be found in serious numbers. US nuclear forces have not been used either...

>When are we going to stop all this behavior by 2% of the population which is hurting the other 98%?

So your behaviour has no bad consequences ?
You're an American, so I'd bet real money that even though I earn more than you, both of my cars do vastly better gas mileage. indeed I mostly use public transport. Do you walk every journey you can ?
Doubt it.

We screwed up, no question.

But look at what we did before, and what we will do again.
Without modern finance there would be no Chinese or Indian economic miracles. Growth on the planet would have been 1-2% less every year. We have taken half a billion people out of abject poverty.

The screwup means we will have to wait longer for Africa, and that's tragic, but don't kid yourself that aid does anything but stop kids dying in such awful numbers.
The fix is growth. You need credit for that, and you can no more run a 21st economy with 19th century banking than you can run it with 19th century transport or mechanical adding machines.

Technology will cause shit to happen. Planes crash and spread swine flu (though not at the same time). Mechanisation means industrial killing machines, and modern medicine meant that GW Bush did not die of his chemical abuses.
Phototography brought child porn, and that in some years cars kill more people than guns on this
  planet.

>Corporations have been hijacked by the executive class for their own benefit- not societies benefit.
I interview bankers for a living, and will share that they come from a wider range of backgrounds than any type of people I interact with. There is a stronger negative correlation with parental income. The % of first / second generation immigrants is high.

What you have here is a meritocracy, which is of course, not a popular form of social organisation.

And yes, I'm a pimp for bankers, I know how grossly imperfect it is, you got a better one you can point to ?

Comment Re:Bogus artilce by clueless arts graduate (Score 1) 624

In my experi8ence (as a headhunter for banks), most MBAs fail to exhibit any knowledge of maths beyond high school level.
Actually that's unfair...

Although of course MBAs are a very wide range of people, I have noticed that many actively dislike maths, more than can be attributed to lack of ability.

I can't play the guitar or paint, and my knowledge of the political structure of Renaissance Venice is quite pathetic.

But I'm not proud of these ignorances, nor indeed am I proud of not knowing the plural of "ignorance" :)

But often MBAs are, same with technology and if one more of them says "this is a people industry" to me, I may just strangle them.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Religion is something left over from the infancy of our intelligence, it will fade away as we adopt reason and science as our guidelines." -- Bertrand Russell

Working...