84684
submission
Kahlil in Virginia writes:
This article (http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID =/20070201/LOCAL/702010431/) from Indiana describes how the NFL is using its lawyers to intemidate and ban churches from hosting Superbowl parties. The NFL claims it is copyright infringement and that the churches are to refrain from hosing a party where the words Superbowl are used. The also cannot use a screen larger than 55". However, bars and other places are able to continue showing the program. This strikes me to be a fairly blatent abuse of a power the NFL does not have. Where is the law that says we, as a people, have a contract with the NFL to host parties and show the prgram? As long as the church is not receiving income from this and redistributing the program the NFL should have no leg to stand on. The NFL also blaims ratings and advertisement revenue as part of its decision.
84638
submission
siasl writes:
Maybe this needs to be in the "tinfoil hat" section but my wife was in the car this morning listening to WPLN Nashville when the story about the possible payoff of Global Warming attendees at the Paris conf came on.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/frontpage/story/0,,20043 99,00.html
Then, an hour later when the Global Warming coverage was to repeat. The sidebar about the payoffs was gone. Did WPLN (NPR) get a call to drop the story......
Who knows. /On Tinfoil hat