Comment Re:now called 'low-energy nuclear reactions' (Score 1) 556
Give me a break, "ecatnews" just happened to have the best quote from this NASA engineer. His quote remains nonetheless correct.
Come back with some quality studies published in reputable journals and reproduced by numerous credible scientists, and we'll talk.
You do realize it is impossible to reach this situation if everyone had your mindset... You have to have people "crazy enough" to remotely believe in the possibility of LENR to study it and eventually prove it or disprove it. Your behavior is exactly what has been holding back LENR research for 20 years. Instead of bluntly rejecting it, you should be open-minded and support the current research, even if you currently don't believe in it.
For the record the Focardi report was published in a peer-reviewed journal (Il Nuovo Cimento).
Thermacore (DARPA contractor) reported anomalous heat in Ni-H cells: http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/GernertNnascenthyd.pdf
Very recently at the WSEC 2012 conference, Celani also reported excess heat: http://www.22passi.it/downloads/WSEC2012%20Present.pdf
So, technically speaking, I agree with you, no one can unambiguously prove LENR today. I am just pointing out research and experiments that indicate there are datapoints that current theories cannot explain, and that we may be at the verge of finally proving LENR.