I don't care how stupid, impossible, and just damn right eccentric this sounds.

This edition has been in the work for a long time. So they really didn't even let 4th live in priority for more than three years. I'm not sure they have a good thing going though at all. Everyone I know played 3rd, 4th but eventually consolidated on Pathfinder. Does anyone like their pen and paper role playing game simplified down to 4th's level?

Does someone know? The summary implies all of them. But considering cancer is more of a collection of problems rather than a specific issue it just seems unlikely.

You do have to enter a password but it does cache it for a short time. So in theory a parent making a purchase and handing an iOS device to a child could enable the child to make purchases at will for a short time.

"I can't hear your rational argument over the impeccably better-than-perfect sound from my 83 trillion dollar sound system. Thank you, Monster!"

For the rest of us on /. haven't we had all of our music in FLAC for a decade now? I don't even listen to music much and mine is.

I'm not sure why this particular technology is so bizarrely specious in claims. I'm sure in fifty years we'll argue over the best neural interface with its platinum, massaged, better than reality addition is.

We need some made up law.

"Anything a computer can generate it can understand."
This is why chat bots still suck. Computers cannot generate context.

No one. Seriously. I don't think you can even make certain all the components of an OpenMoko device are clear of your standards.

Price and supply. They're really just not available cheaply and in large quantities.

That OpenJDK could just get the lion share of development and mindshare. If LibreOffice can functionally replace OpenOffice there's hope for OpenJDK. Unfortunately LibreOffice had years of a head start on that front (functionally go-oo, etc).

Perhaps we'll get the same posters here as well. I'm really not sure what could stop a fork of a GPL project.

I've seen many a question or thought like this and I don't understand the underlying wonderment. Web applications aren't different than any other networked applications. You just have a larger selection of clients that could be communicating with you. But you'd never trust ANY client would you?

"Consumers can opt out by turning off their phones."
I guess by that metric people who don't go there are also opting out.

This is really what most of us care about at this point. Maybe 1% of us will actively use the code personally.

While I agree in theory that the name isn't very well thought out, I'm not sure it is really that bad. Sometimes you need to rally on "stupid" things to get motivation. Also I'm not sure Republican or Democrat is any less of a childish joke at this point. Just more historical.