Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Biotech

Printing Replacement Body Parts 101

Deep Penguin sends in a piece that appeared in The Economist a couple of weeks back about a developing technology to "print" body parts for transplant. "A US and an Australian company have developed the $200,000 machine, which works by depositing stem cells and a 'sugar-based hydrogel' scaffolding material. (The stem cells are harvested from a transplant patient's own fat and bone marrow, to avoid rejection down the line.) The companies are Organovo, from San Diego, specializing in regenerative medicine, and Invetech, an engineering and automation firm in Melbourne, Australia. The initial targets are skin, muscle, and 'short stretches of blood vessels,' which they hope to have available for human implantation within five years. Down the line, they expect the technology could even print directly into the body, bypassing the in-vitro portion of the current process."

Comment DDoS? Really? (Score 2, Informative) 332

I'm pretty sure the first "D" in DDoS stands for "Distributed."

If it was really a DDoS, you wouldn't be able to filter the IP out with a simple regex (like the /^65\.55\.(106|107|207)/. from TFA).

To boot, TFA didn't even say DDoS. Maybe that's too much to expect the editors to oh... I don't know...say... RTFA or Fact-Check it?

I should drop my bar a bit, I suppose.
Role Playing (Games)

Ultima Online Expansion Sept. 8, WAR Expansion In Near Future 40

IndustryGamers recently spoke with Mythic Entertainment execs about the futures of Ultima Online and Warhammer Online. UO's newest expansion, Stygian Abyss, was recently given a September 8th release date. As for WAR, they say, "... we just finished up a major patch for Warhammer Online and there's a lot of stuff we're thinking about for improving and enhancing the gameplay experience and guaranteeing that the product lives up to the legacy of the Warhammer franchise. You should expect an expansion in the near future." The Overly Positive blog suggests that recent developer interviews have undergone a change in tone, demonstrating a greater willingness to acknowledge the game's flaws and work out ways to correct them.

Comment The real problem.... (Score 5, Interesting) 213

For those who skimmed TFA:

Last month, Google changed its policy stating that "advertisers will be allowed to use trademark terms in their ad text even if they do not own that trademark or have explicit approval from the trademark owner to use it," Rosetta Stone said

The problem is NOT Google infringing upon the trademarks that Rosetta Stone holds. The issue is that Google is now willingly allowing Joe Schmuck, a competitor, to use trademarks to their own benefit. This seems like a pretty obvious infringement issue. I'm confused though, as to why Google JUST now started to allow this. If it was a no-brainer back when Adwords started, wouldn't they have allowed it at that point? Sounds to me like Adwords revenue was down, and allowing the use of non-approved trademarks in ads made the Adsword space that much more appealing in hopes of getting people off the fence when evaluating their advertising budget.

Comment Solution Looking for a Problem (Score 2, Insightful) 131

Honestly, it seems rather useless (in these examples). I won't knock music in general, but does a computer singing a song really going to be helpful in diagnosing something? Just because you have more information, doesn't mean you have any higher level of useful information.

I will give the presenter props though. That was like a Science Word Bingo caller going for blackout.
Government

Submission + - Can your HOA force an ISP on you?

Siberwulf writes: I bought my house two years ago and it was mandatory that we join the HOA. A few months ago, we noticed more than a few AT&T trucks in our neighborhood, digging up some lawns. Our HOA told us it was the new U-verse service coming in. They told us that since we were part of the HOA, that we would get a discount for signing up. I never signed up, as I'm holding out for FIOS. Today, I read an announcement on our HOA's site that stated:

As more and more of our residents are signing-up with the exclusive [community] AT&T U-verse package, we have had several calls inquiring about how this new amenity is treated when an existing homeowner sells their home. Regardless of whether an existing homeowner is an AT&T customer or not, when a home is sold, the new homeowner is automatically signed-up to receive the [community] AT&T Package. There are no options for other cable/internet providers. Please feel free to call the AT&T Call Center for all the details.

I'm obviously not a lawyer, but isn't that illegal to force this contract on us without having to sign anything? This is going to hurt our home sales considering the plan is roughly $70 per month. What can we do to get out of this, or have this rescinded?
Programming

The ASP.NET Code Behind Whitehouse.gov 143

An anonymous reader writes "The author looks at the markup for the new whitehouse.gov site, launched today. It uses ASP.NET and various JavaScript libraries. It suffers from various inefficiencies, most easily remedied. Check the images and techniques used to build the site front-end."

Slashdot Top Deals

Work continues in this area. -- DEC's SPR-Answering-Automaton

Working...