Magnets!

Dammit, beat me to it.

Well, based on the article (ie, "facts" without proof), and your logic, I can thus put forward, without review, or the need for evidence:

Myth: I am not God.
Fact: I am God.

So, given that my "myth" has a "fact" listed under it, by your logic, it must be so.

Or, back to reality, the definitions that *our* good friend Mr. Webster has for "fact", "myth", and "confirmation" haven't changed, but instead, the problem here your misunderstanding of "unproven and unattributed statement somehow equals fact."