Comment Meh (Score 4, Informative) 195
3M has had a thermal sheet which has outperformed paste for more than 10 years already.
How is this news?
3M has had a thermal sheet which has outperformed paste for more than 10 years already.
How is this news?
I though disinformation is SOP with Governments... Or maybe it is just a British govt trait.
If its passing is inevitable, I want it as hobbled and useless as possible.
The other option is to have it so overreaching that it becomes impossible to do anything without infringing.
Then the courts will have no choice but to ignore it completely.
My personal opinion: I don't like their implementation.
I would prefer to see a version which uses a long "tape" which is covered in a thin film and the data recorded using different coloured dots from whiteboard markers.
Just my 2.
Like most such schemes (and this is not the first), this won't help against patent trolls, as they don't use patents, and are thus immune to the threat of countersuits. A patent troll is sort of the equivalent of what the SCO Group has become: a company which makes nothing, and whose entire purpose is litigation.
Well... it just needs IBM to join because they have a business methods patent on being a patent troll.
From TFA:
... would not use sites that already had unused BT equipment
...
Seems reasonable to refuse on those grounds alone.
FWIW, this is my personal opinion:
It would never happen. Today's purpose of patents is different from when the concept was created. The use today is to prevent a small or single owner nimble upstart from usurping the business of an incumbent elephant and potentially gutting the cash cow of it's shareholders.
The aforementioned incumbents would fight tooth and nail, with large campaign contributions and gifts, to prevent such a law from ever passing.
I had thought that IBM had a problem with attrition among their mainframe programmers: More of them dying though natural causes than entering the field.
There is something undeniably very sexy about the female British voice.
I am British and I would disagree with your statement.
If you need to "run" code, either in your head or on a computer, in order to see what it's going to do, you're probably not really programming and you're definitely not an engineer.
We have a cocaine fountain in the lobby? Why does no one tell me of these things?
As an added bonus, they can not adhere to RoHS when building their disposable gliders and pollute their enemies with PCBs, lead, cadmium, mercury and lots of other lovely chemicals...
The pointless application of technology just for the simple sake of technology seems a waste.
Now, a subject course where students have to buy and learn to program a $25 computer, no more expensive than a typical textbook, that would be a worthwhile application of technology in schools.
*sighs*
"It's the best thing since professional golfers on 'ludes." -- Rick Obidiah