Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Anti-science? See, now you have proof! (Score 1) 316

if you really want to talk to a young earth creationist (I don't know why you would)

To teach, of course. And I echo everything you said.

A creationist most likely believes what he believes because it's what he's been told to believe. In most cases the best you can do is get them to believe something different by telling them to believe it and doing so with more charisma than whoever instilled them with their original beliefs. If you can teach them to _understand_, then you have achieved a wonderful goal, but first you have to get them listen...

Comment Re:Couldn't you come up... (Score 1) 210

...with a better word than "brainwashing?" Since that already means something that does not match the contents of the article.

BEEP BOOP I am a robot can't detect a joke.

Brainwashing is a perfect word to use here since that's exactly what's happening.

"brainwashing" != "brain washing". And I don't think it was that the OP didn't get the pun, it's just that the pun was crap. As I said above, I would have gone with a pun on "dirty mind" if it was my headline.

Comment Re:I only go... (Score 1) 415

When you feel lousy for "two or three days"? That's a cold. That's not the flu. You are not some ubermensch who can fight off the flu in a few days.

Wikipedia says "Approximately 33% of people with influenza are asymptomatic.", so it would seem that you're wrong from the outset - 1/3 of people will, on average, fight it off without every developing symptoms, even with a complete lack of superpowers.

I don't get flu shots. I've thought about it. And i'm 3 weeks into something I caught that is just lingering on, so maybe right now I wish I had, but there's no guarantee that it wasn't just some non-influenza virus that made my sinuses infected.

Comment Re:At Red Bull thirty (Score 1) 309

A lot of the energy drinks are sugar free, and Red Bull does have a sugar free variety. I really don't understand why you wouldn't want sugar in an energy drink. It's like 1 or 2 cans a day max anyway, and you're so hyper when you're on it, it's not like you won't burn off the calories anyway.

I share your point of view. Caffeine is a stimulant and makes you feel a bit perked up, but without the sugar where is the energy??

Comment Re:OMG OMG OMG!!! (Score 4, Interesting) 184

Oh my goodness I'm freaking out and waving my hands like a schoolgirl right now.

But seriously, the Web of Fear is one of my favorite classic Doctor Who episodes, despite the fact that the only available version is almost entirely an audio reconstruction with still-photograph accompaniment. Notably, this episode is where the much beloved stiff-upper-lip character Lethbridge-Stewart is first introduced. He is of course instantly recognizable even as part of an audio-only soundtrack.

As much as I enjoyed the 3rd (Jon Pertwee) and 4th (Tom Baker) Doctors, like everyone else, I'd go so far as to say that many of the 1st (William Hartnell) and 2nd (Patrick Troughton) Doctors' episodes were some of the most interesting and entertaining of the entire series, just as many of the most original and memorable episodes of Star Trek and TNG came during their first and second seasons. The more I watch the older episodes of Doctor Who the more I appreciate what they accomplished, especially in the context of the fact that the series started out in 1963 in seriously grainy black and white as basically a televised live-action play. So finding more old episodes is a big thing for me. I love 'em.

I'm also one of those weirdos who thinks the most recent few seasons of the show are boot-licking, Doctor-worshiping, ultra-melodramatic, vomit-inducing crap that caused Doctor Who to go from one of my favorite shows of all time to something I cannot physically stomach watching anymore. But I digress.

Hooray for more classic Doctor Who!

They started playing Doctor Who from the start here (Australia) a while back, and I really enjoyed it. One episode was entirely set in the tardis where the tardis seemed jammed and was trying to tell them something and they had to figure out what it was. And the hand to hand combat fighting was absolutely awful. And the Dalek's spaceship wobbled on the string it was suspended on. Awesome stuff :) Unfortunately The timeslot ended up conflicting with meal times and hungry kids aren't compatible with TV watching, so i gave up watching it. This was before I had a PVR or anything.

Comment Re:The public paid for them, the BBC threw them aw (Score 2) 184

If I recall correctly from the previous Dr. Who story on here, the episodes fall to the public domain 50 years after their production (so 2016-2019 for these episodes). So BBC is capitalizing on the last few years when they can make money off these. Yes, I'm disappointed too but not the least bit shocked.

http://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/13/10/03/2232213/first-few-doctor-who-episodes-may-fall-to-public-domain-next-year?sdsrc=popbyskid

Are they releasing the lost episodes verbatim, or is some remastering involved? And if they are remastered, does that constitute a new original copyrightable work?

Comment Re:At Red Bull thirty (Score 2) 309

You ever had a Red Bull? I've never had a Red Bull before, but I had a Red Bull last night — I really like Red Bull reeeeeeed buuuuuuuuullllllllah

I find stimulants only wind me up, they do nothing for improving problem solving or working though logic. Fruit sugar is the best brain fuel - eat an apple, peach, pear, raisins, etc. Of course, the phony stimulant companies don't want you to know it's that simple or inexpensive.

Fruit sugar? Like fructose? Yeah I'm sure there is not much of that in energy drinks... almost certainly much less than in an apple.

(sarcasm aside, red bull appears to be one of the few energy drinks that actually doesn't have much fructose in it... the things you learn from google!)

Security

Army Researching Network System That Defends Against Social Engineering 57

Nerval's Lobster writes "The U.S. Army Research Laboratory has awarded as much as $48 million to researchers trying to build computer-security systems that can identify even the most subtle human-exploit attacks and respond without human intervention. The more difficult part of the research will be to develop models of human behavior that allow security systems decide, accurately and on their own, whether actions by humans are part of an attack (whether the humans involved realize it or not). The Army Research Lab (ARL) announced Oct. 8 a grant of $23.2 million to fund a five-year cooperative effort among a team of researchers at Penn State University, the University of California, Davis, Univ. California, Riverside and Indiana University. The five-year program comes with the option to extend it to 10 years with the addition of another $25 million in funding. As part of the project, researchers will need to systematize the criteria and tools used for security analysis, making sure the code detects malicious intrusions rather than legitimate access, all while preserving enough data about any breach for later forensic analysis, according to Alexander Kott, associate director for science and technology at the U.S. Army Research Laboratory. Identifying whether the behavior of humans is malicious or not is difficult even for other humans, especially when it's not clear whether users who open a door to attackers knew what they were doing or, conversely, whether the "attackers" are perfectly legitimate and it's the security monitoring staff who are overreacting. Twenty-nine percent of attacks tracked in the April 23 2013 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report could be traced to social-engineering or phishing tactics whose goal is to manipulate humans into giving attackers access to secured systems."

Slashdot Top Deals

All power corrupts, but we need electricity.

Working...