They did not focus on the general purpose computing circuitry so that power and heat could be reduced. The main focus was on gaming. Seperate cards will be created specifically for computing.

Well, it's two wider, isn't it? It's not nineteen. You see, most blokes, you know, will be serving at nineteen. You're on nineteen here, all the way up, all the way up, all the way up, you're on nineteen on your rack. Where can you go from there? Where?

15 years ago, back when we had CRT's for monitors, this was widely studied. 24 fps was used for movies as it was the minimum frame rate required for people to detect motion. 60 fps was determined to be the rate at which 85% of people could no longer detect frames. I remember one person we tested could detect frames up to about 85 fps. I'm not sure where these other numbers came from (i.e. 120fps, 240 fps, etc).

http://www.10paperairplanes.com/how-to-make-paper-airplanes/08-the-champ.html

We will never need more than 256KB.

Being a doubter I had always questioned the ban on electronics. This was until one time we couldn't land due to interference. The landing systems were inoperable. We were unable to land until the stewardess found the person whose device was causing the interference. After the flight I did some research and found that faulty grounding in the plane can result in devices causing interference with the electronics. In our case it wiped out the landing navigation. I doubt this is the case with all planes but I can speak of at least one.

It's not the terrorists that scare me. It's the security checkpoints at the airports. They do any and all things to you and have the backing of the government.

Everything is made out of triangles these days. The question is how many triangles can the sun push.

Since when did it become a crime to be a Christian? Why can't people accept that there may be other ways to look at things other than their own? How many times has "science" gotten it wrong? It seem like every time. Scientist keep revising and changing what is true. You have to agree with the latest scientific fad or you are labeled "stupid". Seriously? Are people that afraid of other beliefs that you cast out others because they believe differently? I would think if you truely believed in your beliefs you would feel sympathetic towards others who do not. Using name calling is typically a sign of weakness and a last resort when you don't have any good arguments to make.

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.