Comment Re:Part of the solution? (Score 1) 243
The part that I think the parent finds objectionable - and I tend to agree - is the suggestion that they're actually removing features from already-sold devices. I don't think it's reasonable to remove functionality from a device after selling it, unless it's absolutely necessary to prevent damage to the device or danger to the user. They're welcome to remove it from devices that haven't yet sold, so long as people are clear what they're getting when they do purchase those devices.
I think the fact that Samsung would prefer not to have sold the functionality, in hindsight, shouldn't give them the right to remove it from their existing customers' private devices. If they are encouraged (for instance, via a class action) not to view this as a quick and simple solution then hopefully it will not become their first answer to future problems of this type.