Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Human Creative Genius?!? (Score 1) 311

I can see it applying to any of the following:

Criteria III - Cultural Criteria III: Bear a unique or at least exceptional testimony to a cultural tradition or to a civilization which is living or which has disappeared;

Criteria IV - Cultural Criteria IV: Be an outstanding example of a type of building, architectural or technical ensemble or landscape which illustrates (a) significant stage(s) in human history;

Criteria VI - Cultural Criteria VI: Be directly or tangibly associated with events or living traditions, with ideas, or with beliefs, with artistic and literary works of outstanding universal significance (preferably used in conjunction with other criteria);

Comment Re:They shouldn't dismiss this out of hand. (Score 3, Interesting) 311

Maybe we should make the Internet as a whole a World Heritage site? One of the primary benefits of the Internet is that it allows almost anyone in the world to create and publish content, for free. Wikipedia and Facebook are but two different sides of this same coin.

I see something that has radically changed human communication and content distribution for the better to be a hugely important part of world heritage. Maybe you're right that Wikipedia on its own shouldn't qualify, but I was a bit taken aback by the derisive tone of most of the comments.

Comment They shouldn't dismiss this out of hand. (Score 4, Interesting) 311

First of all, it's Adrian Chen, not Adam Chen.

Second, his remark is completely unfounded. It's not the contributions of the idiot savant contributers that matters; it's the project as a whole. Or were the pyramids just "the fixation of a manual-laboring slave" ? Sometimes a whole can be more than the sum of its parts.

Personally I think an introduction to almost every field of human knowledge that almost anyone can understand is more important than a big, pointy tomb.

Comment Re:..in your face, Ebert! (Score 1) 58

I'll respond in English because you did in the majority of your post is in that language, leading me to believe that you are more comfortable in it than in French.

I'm sorry for missing the sarcasm in your post; your typically French half-joking anti-Americanism and your French signature made me think that you identified ethnically as a member of some Francophone culture. Since you identify as American, the situation is completely different -- I believe in Jesus's teaching to "take the plank out of your own eye before taking the speck from your brother's" (even though I am not a Christian), which means I find Americans criticizing American culture to be much more acceptable than French people doing so.

I am 100% American, born to and raised by 100% American parents, and I vote for leftists, don't think potato chips are a staple of good eating, care about the environment, and value intellect and learning: all contrary to common French stereotypes about my people. That's why even though I'm the biggest Francophile I know, the derisive attitude of many (but not all) French people, which stems from ignorance about the good parts of American culture, irks me greatly.

So I apologize for flying off the handle at you, but I hope that after reading this post you'll understand why I did so.

Comment Re:..in your face, Ebert! (Score 1) 58

Va plus sur ce site si tu toleres pas les Américains. Franchement j'en ai marre de ces francophone qui croient que c'est eux le seul peuple civilisé du monde, ou que les Etats-Unis sont un pays de sauvages. Oui il y a des sauvages ici, mais pas plus qu'en France (ou en Belgique, Québec, etc... je sais pas exactement d'oà tu viens)

Slashdot Top Deals

Quantity is no substitute for quality, but its the only one we've got.

Working...