Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Here I come. (Score 1) 732

You mean, the US, with its state of the art, best of breed health care is worse than covering everyone with crappy care that doesn't offer nearly the same care as available in the US?

100% coverage that is crappy isn't an improvement.

Are you sure your comment isn't just a "God Bless America" comment meant to blindly rant against another country because it's getting more and more difficult to say the USA is the greatest nation in the world?

Comment Re:Say what? (Score 0) 186

The problem is Google has already indexed most of them without asking. Therefore, Google has the advantage of having content from various news sites already in place, and the un-indexed sites are at a disadvantage because there are other indexed sites. The option to be excluded from the index would only have worked had Google never orignially indexed any news site without explicit permission. I realize the purpose of a search engine is to index sites and direct people toward those sites. However, Google seems to have reached a point at which it has become a content provider, displaying content from these sites and never actually directing people toward those sites.

To some extent, they seem to be doing the same thing Gracenote did, indexing content from many sources and ultimately profiting from that content with little to return to those contributors.

Try not to miss the point, that Google seems to have gone from a search engine to a site that actually scours the internet for content for itself, rather than directing people to the sites the content came from. I am not saying no site ever gets additional views because of a link from Google. And note that every anti-Google comment gets modded away, regardless of the validity of the comment. You may or may not agree with the validity of the comments in this post. But every anti-Google comment gets modded away, not just this one.

Comment Re:opening for Google? (Score 1) 76

I am in Kansas City and it is questionable whether I can get it. Because they only give it to people who have enough pre-subscribers in their area (they call the areas Fiberhoods) who also sign up for it. I am the only person in my Fiberhood who is a potential subscriber. My friend's neighborhood had 3 people sign up so far, far from the goal. My brother's neighborhood reached the goal and he can actually get it. In general, it looks like their strategy has, in a roundabout way, led to mostly middle and upper classes being eligible for the service and other neighborhoods being deprived. AT&T U-verse isn't available in my neighborhood either, although it's available in my aunt's neighborhood. I'm sure Time Warner is breathing a sigh of relief that their monopoly will still be intact for most of the city.

Comment Re:Good (Score 2) 228

They also say "up to" with the knowledge that nobody will understands it means "hardly ever reaching". I wish we had laws against misleading advertising in the United States. Instead, they allow "puffery", which seems to me like the opposite of a law against misleading advertising. As a side note, Google Fiber also says "up to".

Slashdot Top Deals

There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.

Working...