Continue with your whining.
The only whining I hear about transportation are the poor techies who have commute 30 minutes from San Francisco in their car. Cry me a river!
The Capitalist CEO acquires his wealth by making and selling things, or providing a service to other people, or managing an organisation that does this. If people don't like his product or service, he doesn't make any money.
According to a recent study, there's no connection between a CEO's performance and pay. The last Fortune 500 company I worked for laid me off along with 10% of the workforce so the CEO could give himself a 66% raise for having a lousy fiscal year from selling fewer techie widgets than expected. Neither the board nor Wall Street punished him for his mismanagement. He bought another vacation home to keep up with all the other CEO Jones.
That's not Capitalism, that's Marxism.
Trains are among the most efficient transportation methods (hard wheels on smooth rails = low rolling resistance) but the journey may not be the fastest nor most direct.
I just started a job at a hospital. The fastest route to the hospital in the morning is a two-hour bus trip (four connections). Not being a major tech employer, its the last stop for the buses and shuttles after winding through all the nearby tech companies. The fastest route home in the afternoon is a one-hour trip via two buses, a commuter train and a light rail train. Taking the train is an extra five bucks per day that I'm not sure if I want to do on a regular basis.
They're Marxists and like good Marxists they've implemented a good Marxist model internally with their CEO getting paid a thick wedge of cash and flying to work. What they want is to carry on their pissy little lives promoting policies to prevent you from doing the same.
Not much difference between a Marxist CEO and a Capitalist CEO when it comes to perks. CEO's are more equal than the rest of humanity.
How far is it from Amsterdam to Luxembourg anyway?
A four-hour drive by car (359.5 km), according to Google. I'm curious to know if taking a plane is more energy efficient than a car or train.
Redundancy should only be necessary when and where it makes sense.
Paperwork in triplicate is the only thing that counts in government.
The presidential debate would be less insane if civics and debate were required courses. Most Americans are clueless to how the government is supposed to work, and aren't capable of disecting a serious argument to separate the lies from the truth. Political pundits have reduced the presidential debates to another form of entertainment for the masses who want to be told to think because forming, analyzing and defending their own opinion hard work.
As usual, jumping to conclusions with incomplete data.
You don't seriously expect people to read beyond the article title before jumping into the comments?
Well it would probably be all scrambled anyway unless we got one of those pirate boxes to descramble it for us....
If the signal wasn't scrambled, all those naked blue-colored girls I saw on a TV as a teenager may actually be naked blue-colored girls... from SPACE!
To understand a program you must become both the machine and the program.