You don't believe the doctor have the right to decide how he will use his own body. (What if not his body will he be forced to use to perform the abortion? What if not his body will he be denied to use to perform non murdering medicine if he refuse to become a murderer?) You also don't believe that the would be abortion victim have the right to decide that his own body should not be destroyed. Then you talk about the mothers rights towards her body.

You say a doctor can't push his ethics on others by refusing to commit murder. Then you argue for forcing your ethics on the doctor by the government's guns. (The government will point their gun towards him and force him to commit murder or never practicing non murdering medicine again, destroying the way he puts food on the table for his children)

What you wrote is modded insightful. My reply will probably be modded down. As God said through the apostle Paul in the Bible:

Sure. A religion where you go to Hel for failing to die in battle will definatly motivate you to avoid murder, rape, etc.* As we all know the vikings never ever did any thing like that at all.

* The thread starter's complaints.

Anders Behring Breivik, the Utøya shooter, is kept away from the other prisoners so they won't kill him. (A price tag has been put on his head) At the moment the prison is planning to build a high security department (article in norwegian) for him. So the problem is here but it's not as big as in the USA (yet).

According to his own manifesto Anders Behring Breivik, the guy that tried bombed a government building in Norway before he went to the ruling party’s youth camp and started shooting people, believe in evolution.

The newest version of the GPL, version 3, forbids it. GPLv2, the license of the Linux kernel, may allow it. Android is mostly Apache 2.0.

Gold is not fiat since gold have other uses than money. A currency consisting of gold coins where the value is the gold content would not be fiat. The same can be said for other commodities. (Not all commodities are created equal. I would not recommend an apple currency. They tend to rot and lose value. If you try to divide an apple it will rot even faster. The supply of apples can easily be inflated by farming them. It would still technically be hard money)

The word "imply" in "correlation does not imply causation" refers to logical implication. However, you are correct if you (as I suspect you did) say that a correlation may suggest a causation.

Correlation does not imply causation.

Were you looking for it at all?

Not all libertarians are anarcho-capitalists. Randians for example would not mind the government stopping violent thugs.

When a robber offers to return some of what he stole from you it's not immoral to accept it back. Most libertarians believe that the same thing applies to the state and what it taxed from you.

Perhaps he lives in the USSA and wants to avoid getting thrown in jail for "domestic terrorism" like the liberty dollar guy was.

To assume that aliens, if they exist, think like man, I can forgive, since it's hard to imagine another way of thinking even if an alien way to think would be more realistic. However, your assumption that they think like a small group of humans that only have existed for a small part of human history (that I assume you are a part of) makes me think you should expand you horizons a bit. The potential aliens might just as well reason like this: "They're not usable as gladiators for hire to entertain us, even if we pay each winning gladiator with the knowledge of a technology that is decades ahead of their level, as they have to many inhibitions to fight in an entertaining way. They're not advanced enough to make porn extremely superior to the real thing (something that wiped out all of our specie except our ancestors, blessed be their wisdom, that saw the evil of unproductive sex). Even without this temptation they not only allow unproductive sex but in many places encourage it, even between individuals of the same sex. Since many of them are offended by the idea of superior races of their own specie how will they react to our superiority? Better stay away." (Note that this alien still is peace full. It won't attack or force amyone to do anything. The gladiators are volunteers that go for their own reasons, like the hope to become rich from alien technology when they return victorious)

I check the context. You do the same when you tell the difference between the meaning of "gay" in "that's gay", "gay rights" and "Make the Yule-tide gay".

Hint: Jude 7:

If you prefer it in the sodomites own words: "Where [are] the men which came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them." (part of Genesis 19:5) If your not familiar with Biblical language and are confused by the term "know", here is a hint: "And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived")

Already today you have gun owners defending their life and property.

However, the fact that your argument is wrong does not invalidate your conclusion: If you live in or near a city, a major disaster hits and people suspect that you have canned food chances are that you will run out of bullets, will to kill or the part of your aiming that depends on luck* before the city runs out of people wanting your canned food.

* training at shooting reduces that fraction but it will still be there

In that case I'm certain that you rejoice in the free speech of North Korea and Saudi Arabia. The freedom to praise the communist party in North Korea and to tell how awesome Mohamed was in Saudi Arabia must warm your heart. Personally I find any definition of free speech that only include approved speech meaningless. Real freedom of speech includes the freedom to say things both people like you and those in power hates to hear. That includes the right to say that God hates fags and fag enablers or for that matter to say that that some sort of speech should be banned.