Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:99.3% accurate? (Score 1) 239

Besides the current near impossibility of building a clone instead of using existing DNA, he made that statement because the method for sequencing is only 99.3% accurate. So basically, you completely missed his point, since he was saying he understood they may not need 100% accuracy (not cloning), but wondered where something with a 99.3% sequencing accuracy would be applicable.

Comment Re:Suicide? (Score -1, Troll) 785

Rest assured, though, it will be a cold day in hell before I purchase another consumer electronics device from Microsoft.

That's a shame, since this (likely temporary) problem is a result of Microsoft shoehorning new features that are intended for new hardware onto their old players. A great treat for the consumer and something standing in stark contrast to many other companies' modus operandi.

Slashdot Top Deals

We warn the reader in advance that the proof presented here depends on a clever but highly unmotivated trick. -- Howard Anton, "Elementary Linear Algebra"

Working...