But why emit energy if you can use it?

This is only one line of thinking.

A completely different approach would be, for example, to hold those who make statements accountable for them.
And this should apply to advertisements as well. And even to "indirect" statements like (publicly) pointing to a research paper.

I always wondered why codecs do not parameterize over known musical instruments, detect them, and subtract them from the signal, to encode the remainder using psychoacoustic models.

I think the whole point was that, with this so-called "research", even the smart people buy crap.

Perhaps somebody can explain this to me.

If in Quantum Mechanics anything can happen with a certain (perhaps very small) probability, then in an infinite amount of time anything will in fact happen.
This proves that the universe will in fact never collapse.

Or does it?

I've been wondering for some time now why TLS (SSH) is not integrated into the OS, to extend the TCP/IP stack on a low level.

The problem is that movie theaters don't show any technological progress.
For instance, where is my holodeck?

Just wait until Quantum Physics turns you into a monkey.
The odds are incredibly small, but the rest of eternity is a long time.

Can't we have something like "net-neutrality" for e-readers and video viewers?
I mean, it is kind of the same principle.

Also, people start working on mainframes again. Except now they call it "the cloud".

Could you then please sketch what an Uber advertorial should like like?

Thank goodness my Amazon drone-delivered goods were not destroyed by this incident.

Will this be a darknet, where google and wikipedia pretend that santa claus exists?

Good for them.
Open sourcing .NET will probably work better than just shouting "developers, developers, developers!!!"

/dev/null