Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Whining, Excuses and a Guilt Trip! (Score 2, Informative) 290

The recipe as a list of ingredients and instructions does not in general qualify for copyright protection.. (This does assume United States jurisdiction.) Here is a nifty quote and link for you:

http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl122.html:

Copyright law does not protect recipes that are mere listings of ingredients. Nor does it protect other mere listings of ingredients such as those found in formulas, compounds, or prescriptions. Copyright protection may, however, extend to substantial literary expression--a description, explanation, or illustration, for example--that accompanies a recipe or formula or to a combination of recipes, as in a cookbook.

You would have to include more than just a standard recipe to qualify. In this case the "magazine" is clearly in violation (assuming they did not have permission) because they copied not just the recipe but the format, style, imagery and non-recipe text included in the article.

Comment Re:I can absolutely guarantee (Score 1) 764

The issue here is not "owning" a copied item it is DISTRIBUTING a copyrighted item. That is the key that everyone overlooks.

In this case the verdict should be against Jammie Thomas and she should have to pay a fine for each copy distributed. All 0 of them. For a grand total of $0.00. (I don't think investigators downloading a copy of each song should count, but if they do then that is 24 distributions.)

Comment Re:Well, I Owe My Friend an Apology (Score 1) 278

This very much depends on jurisdiction. Most "leash laws" only to apply to certain types of animals, notably dogs. In most jurisdictions there is no requirement for "safe animals" such as cats, gerbils, hamsters and the like.

In addition, in the majority of the country such a deliberate act can turn into a cause of action by the animal's owner (including negligence charges). It can also be a crime to intentionally poison an animal as such, you can be charged with cruelty to animals in several States.

To give a concrete example from my home State: If you were to leave out a pan of anti-freeze to intentionally poison a pest and my cat were to drink it and die, the following would be possible:

*You could be charged with the class C felony cruelty to animals (as anti-freeze is a very inhumane poison and even has warnings on the label). This caries with it a hefty monetary fine (although I do not know the maximum) and up to 5 years in prison.

*You would be financially responsible for any and all vet bills. Any associated costs would also be included. *You could be sued for emotional distress. This is not a small thing, I have a friend who works at Dove Louis Animal Hospital, she has told me of incidents where a very not-nice person did something similar, was sued. The judgment against that person (in Civil court) was over one quarter of a million dollars (including vet bills).

In summary I just want to say that anyone who would do this to another living being is about as worthless as can be. That is in addition to the complete ignorance of the situation as a whole.

Comment Re:Priorities.. (Score 1) 379

The main difference is that the spammer never showed up to court and the medical company did. Who knows what the fine would have been if he had made any attempt to defend himself. Instead facebook made a claim saying, "This guy is bad, he owes us a billion dollars." This was followed by the judge asking if anyone objected which was followed by crickets chirping.

I entirely agree that a medical malpractice issue resulting in deaths should carry a waaaaay heftier fine than a spam case (the guy also committed fraud, identity theft, hacking). But if the medical company didn't show up to court I bet their fine would be just as large as the plaintiff asked for, even if it too was a billion dollars.

Comment Re:PDF warning? (Score 1) 105

And my apologies back to you and the rest of slashdot for using the phrase 'pdf file'

I should know better!

Its ok, we forgive you. But from now /. is going to require you to type in your PIN number. Not the same PIN number you use at the ATM machine though.

Comment Re:...or you could add something for yourself... (Score 1) 519

Tipping should really be based on locale and income laws.

Example:

In Arizona minimum wages for a waiter/waitress are something like $3 an hour. They also allow tips to be counted for "wages" for the Federal minimum wage.

In Oregon the minimum wage is $8 and tips are on top of that.

So if on average a waiter gets $5 an hour in tips at a mediocre restaurant, the guy in Arizona is making Federal minimum wage or less, while the guy in Oregon is making more on his first day then some entry level skilled job.

*Rounded whole numbers used because I am lazy. =)

Comment Re:Is this any surprise? (Score 1) 206

Except in most jurisdictions Sony DID do something legally wrong. That is why in most of the EU, retailers selling PS3s have offered partial refunds upon request. That is just one example. Here is a link so you don't have to Google it:

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/PS3-playstation-Linux-Rebate-Amazon,10140.html

Comment Re:Irrevocability of public domain dedication? (Score 1) 337

If code is floating around without any license and I include it in my proprietary software, on what grounds can you sue me?

It's PD. You can be sued (you can be sued for anything) but all you need to win is "Here's this thing, it's PD, by so and so, date whatever, and I used it as such. Thank you, I'll be leaving now, and by the way, I'll have court costs, too."

Assuming US jurisdiction (and most western countries actually). If his work is floating around WITHOUT a license, then it is most certainly NOT public domain. To be in the public domain, the copyright holder must EXPLICITLY grant such a right.

If you find some random bit of source code with no license and you include it in your commercial application, you have just committed willful copyright infringement. The second you distribute, you are liable for ungodly penalties which would most likely be many times the gross sales of XYZ program (see RIAA cases for damage examples).

Comment Re:uhhh (Score 1) 545

Bad analogy, since this is leased equipment from Verizon, it's more like you rent an apartment and the landlord changes the busted up locks on your door or performs other various maintenance on their property for you. If you haven't rented before, I can tell you that is quite normal.

Congratulations for not even reading the summary. I think the analogy is quite correct along with most of the rest of the post. From the summary:

I am upset about this because Verizon should not have any way to get into my router and change the settings, especially because I own the router, not them!

Slashdot Top Deals

The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth. -- Niels Bohr

Working...